Effects of cost sharing on long-term care service utilization among home-dwelling older adults in Japan
- PMID: 36280519
- DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2022.10.002
Effects of cost sharing on long-term care service utilization among home-dwelling older adults in Japan
Abstract
Objectives: This study aimed to examine the effect of increased cost sharing on long-term care (LTC) service utilization among home-dwelling older adults, using nationwide long-term care insurance (LTCI) claims data in Japan.
Methods: In August 2015, the coinsurance rate for Japanese LTCI increased from 10% to 20% for higher-income beneficiaries. We analyzed 27,911,076 person-month observations between April 2015 and July 2016 from 1,983,163 home-dwelling older adults (aged ≥ 65 years). We employed a difference-in-differences approach to estimate the effect of the increased coinsurance rate on overall LTC service utilization and for each of the four main service subcategories. The control group comprised those whose coinsurance rates remained at 10%.
Results: The treatment group, whose coinsurance rate increased, accounted for 9.6% of all participants. The raised coinsurance rate caused statistically significant reductions of 0.46% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.36%, 0.56%) and $25.7 (95% CI: $23.7, $27.8) in the percentage of utilization of LTC services and total monthly LTC expenditures per person, respectively. Service utilization decreased in each of the four service subcategories.
Conclusions: The increased coinsurance rate resulted in statistically significant but small reductions in LTC service utilization overall and in each service type among higher-income home-dwelling beneficiaries. Requiring more cost sharing from higher-income individuals may alleviate the fiscal burden on LTC systems without serious reductions in service utilization.
Keywords: Coinsurance rate; Cost sharing; Difference-in-differences approach; Home-dwelling older adults; Long-term care.
Copyright © 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of Competing Interest None.
Similar articles
-
The effects of raising the long-term care insurance co-payment rate on the utilization of long-term care services.Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2020 Jul;20(7):685-690. doi: 10.1111/ggi.13935. Epub 2020 May 23. Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2020. PMID: 32445437
-
Assessment of Behavioral Health Services Use Among Low-Income Medicare Beneficiaries After Reductions in Coinsurance Fees.JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Oct 1;3(10):e2019854. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.19854. JAMA Netw Open. 2020. PMID: 33030552 Free PMC article.
-
[Effects of a multifactorial intervention for improving frailty on risk of long-term care insurance certification, death, and long-term care cost among community-dwelling older adults: A quasi-experimental study using propensity score matching].Nihon Koshu Eisei Zasshi. 2020;67(10):752-762. doi: 10.11236/jph.67.10_752. Nihon Koshu Eisei Zasshi. 2020. PMID: 33361670 Japanese.
-
Considering long-term care insurance for middle-income countries: comparing South Korea with Japan and Germany.Health Policy. 2015 Oct;119(10):1319-29. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2015.06.001. Epub 2015 Jun 11. Health Policy. 2015. PMID: 26117093 Review.
-
Toward developing care outcome quality indicators for home care for older people: A prospective cohort study in Japan.Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2023 May;23(5):383-394. doi: 10.1111/ggi.14578. Epub 2023 Apr 5. Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2023. PMID: 37132041 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
The financing sustainability of long-term care insurance: an example from Nanning, China.Front Public Health. 2025 Apr 22;13:1454037. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1454037. eCollection 2025. Front Public Health. 2025. PMID: 40331119 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous