Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Oct 24;22(1):1960.
doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-14388-y.

Evaluating the feasibility of the Community Score Card and subsequent contraceptive behavior in Kisumu, Kenya

Affiliations

Evaluating the feasibility of the Community Score Card and subsequent contraceptive behavior in Kisumu, Kenya

Dickens Otieno Onyango et al. BMC Public Health. .

Abstract

Background: Women seeking family planning services from public-sector facilities in low- and middle-income countries sometimes face provider-imposed barriers to care. Social accountability is an approach that could address provider-imposed barriers by empowering communities to hold their service providers to account for service quality. Yet little is known about the feasibility and potential impact of such efforts in the context of contraceptive care. We piloted a social accountability intervention-the Community Score Card (CSC)-in three public healthcare facilities in western Kenya and use a mix of quantitative and qualitative methodologies to describe the feasibility and impact on family planning service provision.

Methods: We implemented and evaluated the CSC in a convenience sample of three public-sector facility-community dyads in Kisumu County, Kenya. Within each dyad, communities met to identify and prioritize needs, develop corresponding indicators, and used a score card to rate the quality of family planning service provision and monitor improvement. To ensure young, unmarried people had a voice in identifying the unique challenges they face, youth working groups (YWG) led all CSC activities. The feasibility and impact of CSC activities were evaluated using mystery client visits, unannounced visits, focus group discussions with YWG members and providers, repeated assessment of score card indicators, and service delivery statistics.

Results: The involvement of community health volunteers and supportive community members - as well as the willingness of some providers to consider changes to their own behaviors-were key score card facilitators. Conversely, community bias against family planning was a barrier to wider participation in score card activities and the intractability of some provider behaviors led to only small shifts in quality improvement. Service statistics did not reveal an increase in the percent of women receiving family planning services.

Conclusion: Successful and impactful implementation of the CSC in the Kenyan context requires intensive community and provider sensitization, and pandemic conditions may have muted the impact on contraceptive uptake in this small pilot effort. Further investigation is needed to understand whether the CSC - or other social accountability efforts - can result in improved contraceptive access.

Keywords: Contraception; Kenya; Mystery clients; Provider bias; Quality of care; Social accountability; Sub-Saharan Africa.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

We declare no competing interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Baseline and endline community score cards developed by community members and health facility staff at the public dispensary in Kisumu County
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Baseline and endline community score cards developed by community members and health facility staff at the public health center in Kisumu County
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Baseline and endline community score cards developed by community members and health facility staff at the public health center in Kisumu County

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Cleland J, Conde-Agudelo A, Peterson H, Ross J, Tsui A. Contraception and health. Lancet. 2012;380:149–56. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60609-6. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ministry of Health, Division of Family Health, Family Planning Program. National Family Planning Guidelines for Service Providers. 6th ed. Nairobi: RMHSU; 2018.
    1. National Bureau of Statistics Nairobi K . Republic of Kenya Kenya Demographic and Health Survey 2014. 2015.
    1. Tumlinson K, Speizer IS, Archer LH, Behets F. Simulated clients reveal factors that may limit contraceptive use in Kisumu, Kenya. Glob Health Sci Pract. 2013;1(3):407. doi: 10.9745/GHSP-D-13-00075. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Tumlinson K, Okigbo CC, Speizer IS. Provider barriers to family planning access in urban Kenya. Contraception. 2015;92(2):143. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2015.04.002. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Substances