Consistent preferences, conflicting reasons, and rational evaluations
- PMID: 36281852
- DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X22000978
Consistent preferences, conflicting reasons, and rational evaluations
Abstract
Bermúdez's arguments in favour of the rationality of quasi-cyclical preferences conflate reasons, desires, emotions, and responses with genuine preferences. Rational preference formation requires that the decision-makers not only identify reasons, but also weigh them in a coherent way.
Comment in
-
Frames and rationality: Response to commentators.Behav Brain Sci. 2022 Oct 25;45:e248. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X22001418. Behav Brain Sci. 2022. PMID: 36281897
Comment on
-
Rational framing effects: A multidisciplinary case.Behav Brain Sci. 2022 Jan 24;45:e220. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X2200005X. Behav Brain Sci. 2022. PMID: 35067248
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources