MRI-Guided Fibrosis Ablation vs Conventional Catheter Ablation for Patients With Persistent Atrial Fibrillation

Affiliations

¹ Department of Cardiology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
² School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, England.

Comparative Study

Luuk H G A Hopman et al. JAMA. 2022.

. 2022 Oct 25;328(16):1643-1644.

doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.16292.

¹ Department of Cardiology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
² School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, England.

No abstract available

Comment in

MRI-Guided Fibrosis Ablation vs Conventional Catheter Ablation for Patients With Persistent Atrial Fibrillation-Reply.
McGann C, Akoum N, Marrouche N. McGann C, et al. JAMA. 2022 Oct 25;328(16):1644-1645. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.16295. JAMA. 2022. PMID: 36282262 No abstract available.

Effect of MRI-Guided Fibrosis Ablation vs Conventional Catheter Ablation on Atrial Arrhythmia Recurrence in Patients With Persistent Atrial Fibrillation: The DECAAF II Randomized Clinical Trial.
Marrouche NF, Wazni O, McGann C, Greene T, Dean JM, Dagher L, Kholmovski E, Mansour M, Marchlinski F, Wilber D, Hindricks G, Mahnkopf C, Wells D, Jais P, Sanders P, Brachmann J, Bax JJ, Morrison-de Boer L, Deneke T, Calkins H, Sohns C, Akoum N; DECAAF II Investigators. Marrouche NF, et al. JAMA. 2022 Jun 21;327(23):2296-2305. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.8831. JAMA. 2022. PMID: 35727277 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.