Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Oct 25;17(10):e0276054.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0276054. eCollection 2022.

Personal continuity of GP care and outpatient specialist visits in people with type 2 diabetes: A cross-sectional survey

Affiliations

Personal continuity of GP care and outpatient specialist visits in people with type 2 diabetes: A cross-sectional survey

Anne Helen Hansen et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Background: Continuity of care is particularly important for patients with chronic conditions, such as type 2 diabetes (T2D). Continuity is shown to reduce overall health service utilization among people with diabetes, however, evidence about how it relates to the utilization of outpatient specialist services in Norway is lacking. The aim of this study was to investigate continuity of GP care for people with T2D, and its association with the use of outpatient specialist health care services.

Methods: We used e-mail questionnaire data obtained from members of The Norwegian Diabetes Association in 2018. Eligible for analyses were 494 respondents with T2D and at least one GP visit during the previous year. By descriptive statistics and logistic regressions, we studied usual provider continuity (UPC) and duration of the patient-GP relationship and associations of these measures with somatic outpatient specialist visits. Analyses were adjusted for gender, age, education, self-rated health, and diabetes duration.

Results: Mean age was 62.6 years and mean UPC was 0.85 (CI 0.83-0.87). Two thirds of the sample (66.0%) had made all visits to the regular GP during the previous year (full continuity). Among these, 48.1% had made one or more specialist visits during the previous year, compared to 65.2% among those without full continuity. The probability of outpatient specialist visits was significantly lower among participants with full continuity, compared to those without full continuity (Odds Ratio 0.53, Confidence Interval 0.35-0.80). The probability of visiting outpatient specialist services was not associated with duration of the patient-GP relationship.

Conclusions: We conclude that continuity of care, as measured by Usual Provider Continuity, is high and associated with reduced use of somatic outpatient specialist services in people with T2D in Norway. Continuity and its benefits will become increasingly important as the number of older people with diabetes and other chronic diseases increases.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Flow chart of study population.

References

    1. Ogurtsova K, da Rocha Fernandes JD, Huang Y, Linnenkamp U, Guariguata L, Cho NH, et al.. IDF Diabetes Atlas: Global estimates for the prevalence of diabetes for 2015 and 2040. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2017;128:40–50. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2017.03.024 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Norwegian Institute of Public Health. Diabetes in Norway; 2021. [Available from https://www.fhi.no/nettpub/hin/ikke-smittsomme/diabetes/]. Accessed 28.06.2022.
    1. Jenssen TG, Tonstad S, Claudi T, Midthjell K, Cooper J. The gap between guidelines and practice in the treatment of type 2 diabetes A nationwide survey in Norway. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2008;80(2):314–20. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2007.12.025 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mouland G. [Diabetes in general practice—were treatment goals reached?]. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2014;134(2):168–72. - PubMed
    1. Sandahl K, Nielsen LB, Svensson J, Johannesen J, Pociot F, Mortensen HB, et al.. Increased mortality in a Danish cohort of young people with Type 1 diabetes mellitus followed for 24 years. Diabet Med. 2017;34(3):380–6. doi: 10.1111/dme.13124 - DOI - PubMed