Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Oct 24;61(1):37-43.
doi: 10.1515/cclm-2022-0409. Print 2023 Jan 27.

The next wave of innovation in laboratory automation: systems for auto-verification, quality control and specimen quality assurance

Affiliations

The next wave of innovation in laboratory automation: systems for auto-verification, quality control and specimen quality assurance

A Shane Brown et al. Clin Chem Lab Med. .

Abstract

Laboratory automation in clinical laboratories has made enormous differences in patient outcomes, with a wide range of tests now available that are accurate and have a rapid turnaround. Total laboratory automation (TLA) has mechanised tube handling, sample preparation and storage in general chemistry, immunoassay, haematology, and microbiology and removed most of the tedious tasks involved in those processes. However, there are still many tasks that must be performed by humans who monitor the automation lines. We are seeing an increase in the complexity of the automated laboratory through further platform consolidation and expansion of the reach of molecular genetics into the core laboratory space. This will likely require rapid implementation of enhanced real time quality control measures and these solutions will generate a significantly greater number of failure flags. To capitalise on the benefits that an improved quality control process can deliver, it will be important to ensure that an automation process is implemented simultaneously with enhanced, real time quality control measures and auto-verification of patient samples in middleware. Therefore, it appears that the best solution may be to automate those critical decisions that still require human intervention and therefore include quality control as an integral part of total laboratory automation.

Keywords: human factors; laboratory efficiency; patient safety; total laboratory automation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Felder, R. Obituary: Masahide Sasaki, MD, PhD (August 27, 1933–September 23, 2005). Clin Chem 2006;52:791–2. https://doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2006.067686.
    1. Hawker, CD. Nonanalytic laboratory automation: a quarter century of progress. Clin Chem 2017;63:1074–82. https://doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2017.272047.
    1. MarketsandMarkets. Lab automation market by product [Internet]; 2020. Available from: https://www.marketsandmarkets.com/Market-Reports/lab-automation-market-1....
    1. Plebani, M, Laposata, M, Lundberg, GD. The brain-to-brain loop concept for laboratory testing 40 years after its introduction. Am J Clin Pathol 2011;136:829–33. https://doi.org/10.1309/ajcpr28hwhssdnon.
    1. Ghaferi, AA, Myers, CG, Sutcliffe, KM, Pronovost, P. The next wave of hospital innovation to make patients safer [Internet]; 2016. Available from: https://hbr.org/2016/08/the-next-wave-of-hospital-innovation-to-make-pat....

LinkOut - more resources