Resistance training for postmenopausal women: systematic review and meta-analysis
- PMID: 36283059
- DOI: 10.1097/GME.0000000000002079
Resistance training for postmenopausal women: systematic review and meta-analysis
Abstract
Importance: Numerous studies have been published assessing the effects of resistance muscle training to mitigate menopausal symptoms, given the endocrine muscle function and its metabolic regulation. Therefore, mapping and synthesizing high-quality studies are necessary to help clinical decisions.
Objective: The aim of this study was to assess the effects (benefits and harms) of resistance muscle training for postmenopausal women.
Evidence review: Electronic searches were conducted in MEDLINE (via PubMed), EMBASE, CENTRAL, PEDro, LILACS, and SPORTDiscus up to December 2021. Two independent reviewers selected the retrieved references and extracted relevant data from included studies. The methodological quality (risk of bias) using the Cochrane Risk of Bias table and the certainty of the evidence (GRADE approach) were assessed.
Findings: Twelve randomized clinical trials (n = 452) with unclear to high risk of bias were identified. Compared with no exercise, resistance training (up to 16 weeks) seems to promote an improvement in functional capacity (mean difference [MD], 2.90 points; 95% CI, 0.60-5.20) and bone mineral density (MD, 0.10; 95% CI, 0.10-0.10) and a reduction in the hot flash frequency (13/29 vs 1/29; risk ratio, 13.0; 95% CI, 1.82-93.01) and fat mass (MD, -3.15; 95% CI, -6.68 to 0.38), and no differences were observed between groups regarding abdominal circumference and body mass index. When compared with aerobic exercises, resistance training may result in a reduction of hot flash frequency (7/18 vs 14/18; risk ratio, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.27-0.94) and fat mass (MD, -7.80; 95% CI, -14.02 to -1.58) and no difference in the quality of life and body mass index. Regarding safety, no serious adverse events were reported. Based on the GRADE approach, the certainty of this evidence was graded as very low to low, leading to imprecisely estimated effects.
Conclusions and relevance: Resistance muscle training seems to improve postmenopausal symptoms and functional capacity. Given the low to very low certainty of the evidence, further randomized clinical trials with higher methodological quality and better reports are still needed. As an implication for clinical practice, health professionals should consider individualized aspects such as the previous history of exercise practice, physical capacity, and adaptation period.
Copyright © 2022 by The North American Menopause Society.
Conflict of interest statement
Financial disclosure/conflicts of interest: None reported.
References
-
- Nguyen TM, Do TTT, Tran TN, Kim JH. Exercise and quality of life in women with menopausal symptoms: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2020;17:7049. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17197049 - DOI
-
- Kaunitz AM, Manson JE. Management of menopausal symptoms. Obstet Gynecol 2015;126:859–876. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001058 - DOI
-
- Maestroni L, Read P, Bishop C, et al. The benefits of strength training on musculoskeletal system health: practical applications for interdisciplinary care. Sports Med 2020;50:1431–1450. doi: 10.1007/s40279-020-01309-5 - DOI
-
- Pedersen BK, Febbraio MA. Muscle as an endocrine organ: focus on muscle-derived interleukin-6. Physiol Rev 2008;88:1379–1406. doi: 10.1152/physrev.90100.2007 - DOI
-
- Anderson D, Seib C, Rasmussen L. Can physical activity prevent physical and cognitive decline in postmenopausal women? A systematic review of the literature. Maturitas 2014;79:14–33. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2014.06.010 - DOI
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
