Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Nov 18;11(12):e220182.
doi: 10.1530/EC-22-0182. Print 2022 Dec 1.

Maintaining bone health by estrogen therapy in patients with advanced prostate cancer: a narrative review

Affiliations
Review

Maintaining bone health by estrogen therapy in patients with advanced prostate cancer: a narrative review

Herjan J T Coelingh Bennink et al. Endocr Connect. .

Abstract

The purpose of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) in prostate cancer (PCa), using luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonists (LHRHa) or gonadotrophin-releasing hormone antagonists, is to suppress the levels of testosterone. Since testosterone is the precursor of estradiol (E2), one of the major undesired effects of ADT is the concomitant loss of E2, causing among others an increased bone turnover and bone loss and an increased risk of osteoporosis and fractures. Therefore, the guidelines for ADT indicate to combine ADT routinely with bone-sparing agents such as bisphosphonates, denosumab or selective estrogen receptor modulators. However, these compounds may have side effects and some require inconvenient parenteral administration. Co-treatment with estrogens is an alternative approach to prevent bone loss and at the same time, to avoid other side effects caused by the loss of estrogens, which is the topic explored in the present narrative review. Estrogens investigated in PCa patients include parenteral or transdermal E2, diethylstilbestrol (DES), and ethinylestradiol (EE) as monotherapy, or high-dose estetrol (HDE4) combined with ADT. Cardiovascular adverse events have been reported with parenteral E2, DES and EE. Encouraging effects on bone parameters have been obtained with transdermal E2 (tE2) and HDE4, in the tE2 development program (PATCH study), and in the LHRHa/HDE4 co-treatment study (PCombi), respectively. Confirmation of the beneficial effects of estrogen therapy with tE2 or HDE4 on bone health in patients with advanced PCa is needed, with special emphasis on bone mass and fracture rate.

Keywords: androgen deprivation therapy (ADT); bone health; estetrol (E4); estrogen therapy (ET); transdermal estradiol (tE2).

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Mean percentage change (95% CI) in bone mineral density at 1 and 2 years from baseline by treatment arms. (A) All patients and (B) patients still on allocated treatment only (i.e. patients who were still on allocated treatment at the time of the scan with no additional anticancer therapy, with those on estradiol patch with estradiol values <250 pmol/L assumed not to be adhering to the patching regimen). Data from Langley et al. (2016) (20). LHRH, luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The molecular structures of the four natural estrogens.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Mean levels of bone turnover markers (osteocalcin (A), CTX1 (B)), after 12 and 24 weeks of treatment with 40 mg estetrol (E4) or placebo in patients with prostate cancer treated with an LHRH agonist). Data from Coelingh Bennink et al. (2021) (25). CTX-1, type I collagen telopeptide.

References

    1. Shore ND, Saad F, Cookson MS, George DJ, Saltzstein DR, Tutrone R, Akaza H, Bossi A, van Veenhuyzen DF, Selby B, et al.Oral relugolix for androgen-deprivation therapy in advanced prostate cancer. New England Journal of Medicine 20203822187–2196. (10.1056/NEJMoa2004325) - DOI - PubMed
    1. Shore ND, Antonarakis ES, Cookson MS, Crawford ED, Morgans AK, Albala DM, Hafron J, Harris RG, Saltzstein D, Brown GA, et al.Optimizing the role of androgen deprivation therapy in advanced prostate cancer: challenges beyond the guidelines. Prostate 202080527–544. (10.1002/pros.23967) - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bourke L, Kirkbride P, Hooper R, Rosario AJ, Chico TJ, Rosario DJ. Endocrine therapy in prostate cancer: time for reappraisal of risks, benefits and cost-effectiveness? British Journal of Cancer 20131089–13. (10.1038/bjc.2012.523) - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Leuprolide Study Group. Leuprolide versus diethylstilbestrol for metastatic prostate cancer. New England Journal of Medicine 19843111281–1286. (10.1056/NEJM198411153112004) - DOI - PubMed
    1. Klotz L, Boccon-Gibod L, Shore ND, Andreou C, Persson BE, Cantor P, Jensen JK, Olesen TK, Schroder FH. The efficacy and safety of degarelix: a 12-month, comparative, randomized, open-label, parallel-group phase III study in patients with prostate cancer. BJU International 20081021531–1538. (10.1111/j.1464-410X.2008.08183.x) - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources