Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Oct 25;23(1):267.
doi: 10.1186/s12875-022-01878-6.

Physician participation in quality improvement work- interest and opportunity: a cross-sectional survey

Ellen Tveter Deilkås  1 , Judith Rosta  2 , Fredrik Baathe  2   3   4 , Eirik Søfteland  5 , Åse Stavland Lexberg  6 , Olav Røise  7   8 , Karin Isaksson Rø  2
Affiliations

Physician participation in quality improvement work- interest and opportunity: a cross-sectional survey

Ellen Tveter Deilkås et al. BMC Prim Care. .

Abstract

Background: Lack of physician involvement in quality improvement threatens the success and sustainability of quality improvement measures. It is therefore important to assess physicians´ interests and opportunities to be involved in quality improvement and their experiences of such participation, both in hospital and general practice.

Methods: A cross-sectional postal survey was conducted on a representative sample of physicians in different job positions in Norway in 2019.

Results: The response rate was 72.6% (1513 of 2085). A large proportion (85.7%) of the physicians wanted to participate in quality improvement, and 68.6% had actively done so in the last year. Physicians' interest in quality improvement and their active participation was significantly related to the designated time for quality improvement in their work-hour schedule (p < 0.001). Only 16.7% reported time designated for quality improvement in their own work hours. When time was designated, 86.6% of the physicians reported participation in quality improvement, compared to 63.7% when time was not specially designated.

Conclusions: This study shows that physicians want to participate in quality improvement, but only a few have designated time to allow continuous involvement. Physicians with designated time participate significantly more. Future quality programs should involve physicians more actively by explicitly designating their time to participate in quality improvement work. We need further studies to explore why managers do not facilitate physicians´ participation in quality improvement.

Keywords: Patient safety; Physicians; Quality Improvement; Work environment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form at http://www.icmje.org/coi_disclosure.pdf and declare that they have no competing interests.

References

    1. Davies H, Powell A, Rushmer R. Why don't clinicians engage with quality improvement? J Health Serv Res Policy. 2007;12(3):129–130. doi: 10.1258/135581907781543139. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Allwood D, Fisher R, Warburton W, Dixon J. Creating space for quality improvement. BMJ. 2018;361:k1924. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k1924. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Stone S, Lee HC, Sharek PJ. Perceived factors associated with sustained improvement following participation in a multicenter quality improvement collaborative. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf / J Comm Resources. 2016;42(7):309–315. - PubMed
    1. Weigl M, Hornung S, Angerer P, Siegrist J, Glaser J. The effects of improving hospital physicians working conditions on patient care: a prospective, controlled intervention study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2013;13:401. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-401. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Donabedian A. Promoting the Quality through Evaluating the Process of Patient Care. Med Care. 1968;VI(3):181–202. doi: 10.1097/00005650-196805000-00001. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources