Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2022 Nov 24;108(24):1972-1978.
doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2022-320990.

Prospective RandOmised Trial of Emergency Cardiac Computerised Tomography (PROTECCT)

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Prospective RandOmised Trial of Emergency Cardiac Computerised Tomography (PROTECCT)

Waqar Aziz et al. Heart. .

Abstract

Objective: Many patients presenting with suspected acute coronary syndrome (ACS) have high-sensitivity cardiac troponin (hs-cTn) concentrations between rule-in and rule-out thresholds and hence need serial testing, which is time consuming. The Prospective RandOmised Trial of Emergency Cardiac Computerised Tomography (PROTECCT) assessed the utility of coronary CT angiography (CCTA) in patients with suspected ACS, non-ischaemic ECG and intermediate initial hs-cTn concentration.

Methods: Patients were randomised to CCTA-guided management versus standard of care (SOC). The primary outcome was hospital length of stay (LOS). Secondary outcomes included cost of in-hospital stay and major adverse cardiac events (MACE) at 12 months of follow-up. Data are mean (SD); for LOS harmonic means, IQRs are shown.

Results: 250 (aged 55 (14) years, 25% women) patients were randomised. Harmonic mean (IQR) LOS was 7.53 (6.0-9.6) hours in the CCTA arm and 8.14 (6.3-9.8) hours in the SOC arm (p=0.13). Inpatient cost was £1285 (£2216) and £1108 (£3573), respectively, p=0.68. LOS was shorter in the CCTA group in patients with <25% stenosis, compared with SOC; 6.6 (5.6-7.8) hours vs 7.5 (6.1-9.4) hours, respectively; p=0.021. More referrals for cardiology outpatient clinic review and cardiac CT-related outpatient referrals occurred in the SOC arm (p=0.01). 12-month MACE rates were similar between the two arms (7 (5.6%) in the CCTA arm and 8 (6.5%) in the SOC arm-log-rank p=0.78).

Conclusions: CCTA did not lead to reduced hospital LOS or cost, largely because these outcomes were influenced by the detection of ≥25% grade stenosis in a proportion of patients.

Trial registration number: NCT03583320.

Keywords: acute coronary syndrome; chest pain; computed tomography angiography; coronary artery disease.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow chart of recruitment, randomisation and follow-up of participants. CAD, coronary artery disease; CCTA, coronary CT angiography; hs-cTnT, high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T; SOC, standard of care.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Trial overview. CAD, coronary artery disease; CCTA, coronary CT angiography; FU, follow-up; hs-cTnT, high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T; MACE, major adverse cardiac event; OP, outpatient.

Comment in

  • Emergency cardiac computed tomography.
    Greer C, Newby DE, Adamson PD. Greer C, et al. Heart. 2022 Nov 24;108(24):1928-1929. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2022-321378. Heart. 2022. PMID: 36288925 No abstract available.

References

    1. Goodacre S, Cross E, Arnold J, et al. . The health care burden of acute chest pain. Heart 2005;91:229–30. 10.1136/hrt.2003.027599 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Collet J-P, Thiele H, Barbato E, et al. . 2020 ESC guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation. Eur Heart J 2021;42:1289–367. 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa575 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Marjot J, Kaier TE, Henderson K, et al. . A single centre prospective cohort study addressing the effect of a rule-in/rule-out troponin algorithm on routine clinical practice. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care 2019;8:404–11. 10.1177/2048872617746850 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pickering JW, Greenslade JH, Cullen L, et al. . Validation of presentation and 3 h high-sensitivity troponin to rule-in and rule-out acute myocardial infarction. Heart 2016;102:1270–8. 10.1136/heartjnl-2015-308505 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mueller C, Giannitsis E, Christ M, et al. . Multicenter evaluation of a 0-Hour/1-Hour algorithm in the diagnosis of myocardial infarction with high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T. Ann Emerg Med 2016;68:76–87. 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2015.11.013 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data