Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Sep 30;9(10):1501.
doi: 10.3390/children9101501.

Comparing the Efficacy of Two School-Based Approaches of Neurocognitive Training for Enhancing Executive Functions

Affiliations

Comparing the Efficacy of Two School-Based Approaches of Neurocognitive Training for Enhancing Executive Functions

Han Jiang et al. Children (Basel). .

Abstract

Neurocognitive training has been shown to improve a range of cognitive/executive functions and behavior in children. Delivering this training in a school context may enhance its ecological validity and improve training outcomes. The current study examined the efficacy of two school-based neurocognitive training approaches for enhancing executive functions (EF) in typically developing children: neurocognitive training with no teacher positive feedback (NCT), and neurocognitive training with teacher positive feedback (NCT-TPF). Using a randomized control design, 45 children were randomly allocated to the no-training control, NCT, or NCT-TPF group and completed pre- and post-training assessments on the core executive function (EF) domains of inhibitory control, working memory, and task switching. Teachers' subjective acceptance of the two training protocols was investigated to explore potential ecological validity. The two training groups completed six sessions of training in a kindergarten over a 3-week period. The results showed significant post-training improvements in an untrained inhibitory control task for both training groups when compared with the control group. Different effects were found for each group for the untrained task switching task. While reduced reaction time (RT) in correct Color and Shape trials at Time 2 were reported for the NCT-TPF group, there was no difference compared to the control group for the NCT group. The NCT group showed increased RT in Switch trials but reduced Shape errors compared to controls at Time 2, while these effects were not significant for the NCT-TPF group. An unexpected outcome was that children in both training conditions did not show a significant improvement in an untrained working memory task. Teachers' subjective acceptance consistently supported including positive feedback as part of NCT. While further research is needed, these results support use of neurocognitive training and/or neurocognitive training with teacher positive feedback for typically developing children in a school context.

Keywords: ecological validity; inhibitory control; neurocognitive training; task switching; teacher positive feedback; working memory.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The author(s) declared the following potential conflict of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: S.J.J. is a co-inventor of the cognitive training methodology used in this study which was licensed by University of Wollongong (UOW) to Neuro Cognitive Solutions Pty Ltd. from 2013 to 2016. He was entitled to a portion of royalties received by UOW in relation to the sale of any product using that methodology during that time. There are no current licensing agreements in place.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Significant difference at Time 2 with Time 1 as a covariate for RT to Go Stimuli, Go Accuracy, Correct Color RT, Correct Shape RT, Correct Switch RT, and Shape Errors.

Similar articles

References

    1. APA . Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders: DSM-5. American Psychiatric Association; Arlington, VA, USA: 2013.
    1. Young S., Amarasinghe M.J. Practitioner Review: Non-pharmacological treatments for ADHD: A lifespan approach. J. Child Psychol. Psychiatry. 2010;51:116–133. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2009.02191.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Reichow B., Volkmar F., Bloch M. Systematic review and meta-analysis of pharmacological treatment of the symptoms of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in children with pervasive developmental disorders. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 2013;43:2435–2441. doi: 10.1007/s10803-013-1793-z. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hodgson K., Hutchinson A.D., Denson L. Nonpharmacological treatments for ADHD: A meta-analytic review. J. Atten. Disord. 2014;18:275–282. doi: 10.1177/1087054712444732. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Johnstone S.J., Roodenrys S., Blackman R., Johnston E., Loveday K., Mantz S., Barratt M.F. Neurocognitive training for children with and without AD/HD. Atten. Deficit Hyperact. Disord. 2012;4:11–23. doi: 10.1007/s12402-011-0069-8. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources