Difference in Using Protrusion Face Mask before or after Rapid Palatal Expansion in Skeletal Class III Children: A Preliminary Study
- PMID: 36291471
- PMCID: PMC9600127
- DOI: 10.3390/children9101535
Difference in Using Protrusion Face Mask before or after Rapid Palatal Expansion in Skeletal Class III Children: A Preliminary Study
Abstract
Treatment of third-class malocclusions often presents a challenge for orthodontists. Skeletal disharmony is often associated with dental malposition. There are several therapeutic choices, including the use in combination of transverse expansion of the maxilla with rapid palatal expander (RPE) and posterior-anterior traction with a Delaire face mask (FM). The purpose of the study is to verify whether there are significant differences in the treatment outcome in the case of use of a face mask followed by a palatal expander or with the sequence of these auxiliaries reversed. Subject and Methods: The two groups were both made up of 13 patients, subdivided into group A, i.e., those whose sequence involved the use of extraoral traction first and then the disjunctor, and those with an inverted sequence in group B. Some cephalometric parameters and dento-skeletal characteristics were evaluated pre-treatment (t0) and at the end of therapy (t1). Results: Considering the T1-T0 of group A (Delaire + rapid palatal expander), the evaluation of the results obtained in this work allows us to observe how within group A there is a significant improvement in the Witts and Nanda indices and facial convexity. Group B (treated with the palate disjunctor sequence followed by traction with Delaire's mask) showed a significant improvement in ANB, in AoBo, and AppBpp values and in convexity. The two groups were comparable, and no statistically significant difference was highlighted. Discussion: The early therapy of the third skeletal classes by means of a rapid palate expander and face mask is effective. There is no statistically significant difference in the two groups who performed the therapy in reverse mode. This suggests that the clinician should choose the treatment sequence based on the skeletal and occlusal conditions of their patients at the start of treatment. Conclusion: Early therapy of third skeletal classes with sagittal expansion using a rapid palate expander can be performed earlier or later than posterior-anterior traction with a Delaire mask.
Keywords: early treatment; palatal expansion; rapid palatal expansion; skeletal class III.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Similar articles
-
Bonded versus banded rapid palatal expander followed by facial mask therapy: analysis on digital dental casts.Eur J Orthod. 2016 Apr;38(2):217-22. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjv038. Epub 2015 Jun 11. Eur J Orthod. 2016. PMID: 26070923 Free PMC article.
-
Orthopaedic treatment efficiency in skeletal Class III malocclusions in young patients: RME-face mask versus TSME.Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2012 Sep;13(3):225-30. Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2012. PMID: 22971261
-
A randomized clinical trial to assess the sagittal effects of Transforce transverse appliance (TTA) and NiTi palatal expander (NPE) on skeletal class II malocclusion in growing patients during retention phase - A cephalometric study using a historical control group.Int Orthod. 2020 Dec;18(4):722-731. doi: 10.1016/j.ortho.2020.08.007. Epub 2020 Oct 2. Int Orthod. 2020. PMID: 33020047 Clinical Trial.
-
Early class III treatment with hybrid rapid palatal expander combined with facemask.Int Orthod. 2020 Sep;18(3):624-635. doi: 10.1016/j.ortho.2020.05.002. Epub 2020 Jun 10. Int Orthod. 2020. PMID: 32534993
-
Skeletal response to maxillary protraction in patients with cleft lip and palate before age 10 years.Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1994 Jul;31(4):295-308. doi: 10.1597/1545-1569_1994_031_0295_srtmpi_2.3.co_2. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1994. PMID: 7918525 Clinical Trial.
Cited by
-
Orthodontic treatment for prominent lower front teeth (Class III malocclusion) in children.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Apr 10;4(4):CD003451. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003451.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024. PMID: 38597341 Free PMC article.
-
Three-dimensional volume changes of the palatal vault and pharyngeal airway following facemask therapy and maxillary expansion: a prospective comparative study.BMC Oral Health. 2025 Mar 29;25(1):456. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-05835-4. BMC Oral Health. 2025. PMID: 40158116 Free PMC article.
-
Soft-Tissue Changes in Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate Patients after Non-surgical Maxillary Advancement with Face Mask Therapy - A Prospective Cohort Study.Ann Maxillofac Surg. 2023 Jul-Dec;13(2):179-183. doi: 10.4103/ams.ams_10_23. Epub 2023 Oct 30. Ann Maxillofac Surg. 2023. PMID: 38405550 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Angle E.H. Classification of malocclusion. Dent. Cosm. 1899;41:248–264.
-
- Tweed C.H. Clinicalorthodontics. Mosby; St. Louis, MO, USA: 1966. pp. 715–726.
-
- Moyers R.E. Handbook of Orthodontics. 4th ed. Year Book Medical Publishers; Chicago, IL, USA: 1988. pp. 410–415.
-
- Sanborn R.T. Difference between the facial skeletal patterns of Class III malocclusion. Angle Orthod. 1955;25:208–222.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources