Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Oct 17;14(20):5076.
doi: 10.3390/cancers14205076.

Radiomic and Volumetric Measurements as Clinical Trial Endpoints-A Comprehensive Review

Affiliations
Review

Radiomic and Volumetric Measurements as Clinical Trial Endpoints-A Comprehensive Review

Ionut-Gabriel Funingana et al. Cancers (Basel). .

Abstract

Clinical trials for oncology drug development have long relied on surrogate outcome biomarkers that assess changes in tumor burden to accelerate drug registration (i.e., Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1) criteria). Drug-induced reduction in tumor size represents an imperfect surrogate marker for drug activity and yet a radiologically determined objective response rate is a widely used endpoint for Phase 2 trials. With the addition of therapies targeting complex biological systems such as immune system and DNA damage repair pathways, incorporation of integrative response and outcome biomarkers may add more predictive value. We performed a review of the relevant literature in four representative tumor types (breast cancer, rectal cancer, lung cancer and glioblastoma) to assess the preparedness of volumetric and radiomics metrics as clinical trial endpoints. We identified three key areas-segmentation, validation and data sharing strategies-where concerted efforts are required to enable progress of volumetric- and radiomics-based clinical trial endpoints for wider clinical implementation.

Keywords: clinical trials; data integration; imaging biomarkers; radiomics; surrogate endpoints; volumetric.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow diagram of studies selection process.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The outcome of the decision by year of publication. The bubble chart summarizes the relationships between tumor types, year of publication, number of publications and outcome of the relevance of assessment at abstract screening. The size of the dots represents the number of publications and the colors of the outcome of the decision after assessing the relevance of the publications’ abstracts. The scatter pie chart summarizes the proportion of papers in each relevance category.

References

    1. Clinical Trial Endpoints for the Approval of Cancer Drugs and Biologics. FDA. [(accessed on 12 October 2022)]; Available online: https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents....
    1. Table of Surrogate Endpoints That Were the Basis of Drug Approval or Licensure. FDA. [(accessed on 25 April 2022)]; Available online: https://www.fda.gov/drugs/development-resources/table-surrogate-endpoint....
    1. Eisenhauer E.A., Therasse P., Bogaerts J., Schwartz L.H., Sargent D., Ford R., Dancey J., Arbuck S., Gwyther S., Mooney M., et al. New Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours: Revised RECIST Guideline (Version 1.1) Eur. J. Cancer. 2009;45:228–247. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.10.026. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bera K., Braman N., Gupta A., Velcheti V., Madabhushi A. Predicting Cancer Outcomes with Radiomics and Artificial Intelligence in Radiology. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 2022;19:132–146. doi: 10.1038/s41571-021-00560-7. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bettinelli A., Marturano F., Avanzo M., Loi E., Menghi E., Mezzenga E., Pirrone G., Sarnelli A., Strigari L., Strolin S., et al. A Novel Benchmarking Approach to Assess the Agreement among Radiomic Tools. Radiology. 2022:303. doi: 10.1148/RADIOL.211604. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources