Single CT Appointment for Double Lung and Colorectal Cancer Screening: Is the Time Ripe?
- PMID: 36292015
- PMCID: PMC9601268
- DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12102326
Single CT Appointment for Double Lung and Colorectal Cancer Screening: Is the Time Ripe?
Abstract
Annual screening of lung cancer (LC) with chest low-dose computed tomography (CT) and screening of colorectal cancer (CRC) with CT colonography every 5 years are recommended by the United States Prevention Service Task Force. We review epidemiological and pathological data on LC and CRC, and the features of screening chest low-dose CT and CT colonography comprising execution, reading, radiation exposure and harm, and the cost effectiveness of the two CT screening interventions. The possibility of combining chest low-dose CT and CT colonography examinations for double LC and CRC screening in a single CT appointment is then addressed. We demonstrate how this approach appears feasible and is already reasonable as an opportunistic screening intervention in 50-75-year-old subjects with smoking history and average CRC risk. In addition to the crucial role Computer Assisted Diagnosis systems play in decreasing the test reading times and the need to educate radiologists in screening chest LDCT and CT colonography, in view of a single CT appointment for double screening, the following uncertainties need to be solved: (1) the schedule of the screening CT; (2) the effectiveness of iterative reconstruction and deep learning algorithms affording an ultra-low-dose CT acquisition technique and (3) management of incidental findings. Resolving these issues will imply new cost-effectiveness analyses for LC screening with chest low dose CT and for CRC screening with CT colonography and, especially, for the double LC and CRC screening with a single-appointment CT.
Keywords: CT colonography; chest CT; colorectal cancer; computed tomography; lung cancer; screening.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Figures



Similar articles
-
Impact of computer-aided detection on the cost-effectiveness of CT colonography.Radiology. 2009 Feb;250(2):488-97. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2502080685. Radiology. 2009. PMID: 19188317
-
Computed Tomography Colonography Less Costly Than Colonoscopy for Colorectal Cancer Screening of Commercially Insured Patients.Am Health Drug Benefits. 2018 Oct;11(7):353-361. Am Health Drug Benefits. 2018. PMID: 30647823 Free PMC article.
-
Impact of whole-body CT screening on the cost-effectiveness of CT colonography.Radiology. 2009 Apr;251(1):156-65. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2511080590. Radiology. 2009. PMID: 19332851
-
Screening for Colorectal Cancer: Updated Evidence Report and Systematic Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force.JAMA. 2021 May 18;325(19):1978-1998. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.4417. JAMA. 2021. PMID: 34003220
-
Systematic review of the cost-effectiveness of screening for lung cancer with low dose computed tomography.Lung Cancer. 2022 Aug;170:20-33. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2022.05.005. Epub 2022 May 13. Lung Cancer. 2022. PMID: 35700629
References
-
- US Preventive Services Task Force. Krist A.H., Davidson K.W., Mangione M., Barry M.J., Cabana M., Caughey A.B., Davis E.M., Donahue K.E., Doubeni C.A., et al. Screening for Lung Cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement. JAMA. 2021;325:962–970. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.1117. - DOI - PubMed
-
- US Preventive Services Task Force. Davidson K.W., Barry M.J., Mangione C.M., Cabana M., Caughey A.B., Davis E.M., Donahue K.E., Doubeni C.A., Krist A.H., et al. Screening for Colorectal Cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement. JAMA. 2021;325:1965–1977. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.6238. Erratum in: JAMA 2021, 326, 773. - DOI - PubMed
-
- National Cancer Institute Cancer Stat Facts: Lung and Bronchus Cancer. [(accessed on 30 June 2022)];2021 Available online: https://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/lungb.html.
-
- Snyder R.A., Hu C.Y., Cuddy A., Francescatti A.B., Schumacher J.R., Van Loon K., You Y.N., Kozower B.D., Greenberg C.C., Schrag D., et al. Association Between Intensity of Posttreatment Surveillance Testing and Detection of Recurrence in Patients With Colorectal Cancer. JAMA. 2018;319:2104–2115. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.5816. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources