Radioembolization-Induced Changes in Hepatic [18F]FDG Metabolism in Non-Tumorous Liver Parenchyma
- PMID: 36292207
- PMCID: PMC9600277
- DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12102518
Radioembolization-Induced Changes in Hepatic [18F]FDG Metabolism in Non-Tumorous Liver Parenchyma
Abstract
Background: [18F]FDG-PET/CT is increasingly used for response assessments after oncologic treatment. The known response criteria for [18F]FDG-PET/CT use healthy liver parenchyma as the reference standard. However, the [18F]FDG liver metabolism results may change as a result of the given therapy. The aim of this study was to assess changes in [18F]FDG liver metabolism after hepatic 90Y resin radioembolization. Methods: [18F]FDG-PET/CT scans prior to radioembolization and one and three months after radioembolization (consistent with the PERCIST comparability criteria), as well as 90Y-PET/CT scans, were analyzed using 3 cm VOIs. The FDG activity concentration and absorbed dose were measured. A linear mixed-effects logistic regression model and logistic mixed-effects model were used to assess the correlation between the FDG-activity concentration, absorbed dose, and biochemical changes. Results: The median SULVOI,liver at baseline was 1.8 (range = 1.2−2.8). The mean change in SULVOI,liver per month with an increase in time was 0.05 (95%CI 0.02−0.09) at p < 0.001. The median absorbed dose per VOI was 31.3 Gy (range = 0.1−82.3 Gy). The mean percent change in ΔSULVOI,liver for every Gy increase in the absorbed dose was −0.04 (95%CI −0.22−0.14) at p = 0.67. The SULblood and SULspleen results showed no increase. Conclusions: The [18F]FDG metabolism in the normal liver parenchyma is significantly but mildly increased after radioembolization, which can interfere with its use as a threshold for therapy response.
Keywords: FDG-PET; PERCIST; SIRT; radioembolization.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors of this manuscript declare relationships with the following companies: BTG/Boston Scientific, Terumo, and Quirem. A. Braat is a speaker for BTG/Boston Scientific and Terumo. M. Lam receives research support from Terumo, Quirem, and Boston Scientific, and is a consultant on their behalf. The department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine of the University Medical Center Utrecht receives royalty payments from Quirem. Their radioembolization products were, however, not used in this article. The other authors of this manuscript (C. van Roekel, M.N.G.J.A. Braat) declare no relationships with any companies whose products or services may be related to the subject matter of the article.
Figures






Similar articles
-
First Evidence for a Dose-Response Relationship in Patients Treated with 166Ho Radioembolization: A Prospective Study.J Nucl Med. 2020 Apr;61(4):608-612. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.119.232751. Epub 2019 Oct 10. J Nucl Med. 2020. PMID: 31601696 Clinical Trial.
-
Validation of several SUV-based parameters derived from 18F-FDG PET for prediction of survival after SIRT of hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer.J Nucl Med. 2013 Aug;54(8):1202-8. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.112.116426. Epub 2013 May 31. J Nucl Med. 2013. PMID: 23729697
-
Insights into the Dose-Response Relationship of Radioembolization with Resin 90Y-Microspheres: A Prospective Cohort Study in Patients with Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases.J Nucl Med. 2016 Jul;57(7):1014-9. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.115.166942. Epub 2016 Feb 23. J Nucl Med. 2016. PMID: 26912436 Clinical Trial.
-
Dose-Effect Relationships of 166Ho Radioembolization in Colorectal Cancer.J Nucl Med. 2021 Feb;62(2):272-279. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.120.243832. Epub 2020 Jun 26. J Nucl Med. 2021. PMID: 32591491
-
The role of (18)F-FDG positron emission tomography in the follow-up of liver tumors treated with (90)Yttrium radioembolization.Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2015 Feb 15;5(3):220-32. eCollection 2015. Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2015. PMID: 26069856 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Young H., Baum R., Cremerius U., Herholz K., Hoekstra O., Lammertsma A.A., Pruim J., Price P. Measurement of clinical and subclinical tumour response using [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose and positron emission tomography: Review and 1999 EORTC recommendations. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) PET Study Group. Eur. J. Cancer. 1999;35:1773–1782. doi: 10.1016/S0959-8049(99)00229-4. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Paquet N., Albert A., Foidart J., Hustinx R. Within-patient variability of (18)F-FDG: Standardized uptake values in normal tissues. J. Nucl. Med. 2004;45:784–788. - PubMed
-
- Kanstrup I.L., Klausen T.L., Bojsen-Moller J., Magnusson P., Zerahn B. Variability and reproducibility of hepatic FDG uptake measured as SUV as well as tissue-to-blood background ratio using positron emission tomography in healthy humans. Clin. Physiol. Funct. Imaging. 2009;29:108–113. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-097X.2008.00846.x. - DOI - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources