Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Sep 21;10(10):1824.
doi: 10.3390/healthcare10101824.

The Regulation of Artificial Intelligence in Digital Radiology in the Scientific Literature: A Narrative Review of Reviews

Affiliations
Review

The Regulation of Artificial Intelligence in Digital Radiology in the Scientific Literature: A Narrative Review of Reviews

Daniele Giansanti. Healthcare (Basel). .

Abstract

Today, there is growing interest in artificial intelligence (AI) in the field of digital radiology (DR). This is also due to the push that has been applied in this sector due to the pandemic. Many studies are devoted to the challenges of integration in the health domain. One of the most important challenges is that of regulations. This study conducted a narrative review of reviews on the international approach to the regulation of AI in DR. The design of the study was based on: (I) An overview on Scopus and Pubmed (II) A qualification and eligibility process based on a standardized checklist and a scoring system. The results have highlighted an international approach to the regulation of these systems classified as "software as medical devices (SaMD)" arranged into: ethical issues, international regulatory framework, and bottlenecks of the legal issues. Several recommendations emerge from the analysis. They are all based on fundamental pillars: (a) The need to overcome a differentiated approach between countries. (b) The need for greater transparency and publicity of information both for SaMDs as a whole and for the algorithms and test patterns. (c) The need for an interdisciplinary approach that avoids bias (including demographic) in algorithms and test data. (d) The need to reduce some limits/gaps of the scientific literature production that do not cover the international approach.

Keywords: artificial intelligence; digital radiology; medical devices; regulation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Output from the qualification process.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Giansanti D. The Artificial Intelligence in Digital Pathology and Digital Radiology: Where Are We? Healthcare. 2021;9:30. doi: 10.3390/healthcare9010030. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Assistive Technologies, Robotics, and Automated Machines in the Health Domain. [(accessed on 5 September 2022)]. Available online: https://www.mdpi.com/journal/healthcare/special_issues/Assistive_Technol....
    1. Alsharif M.H., Alsharif Y.H., Yahya K., Alomari O.A., Albreem M.A., Jahid A. Deep learning applications to combat the dissemination of COVID-19 disease: A review. Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci. 2020;24:11455–11460. - PubMed
    1. Ozsahin I., Sekeroglu B., Musa M.S., Mustapha M.T., Uzun Ozsahin D. Review on Diagnosis of COVID-19 from Chest CT Images Using Artificial Intelligence. Comput. Math. Methods Med. 2020;2020:9756518. doi: 10.1155/2020/9756518. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Luce B.R., Drummond M., Jönsson B., Neumann P.J., Schwartz J.S., Siebert U., Sullivan S.D. EBM, HTA, and CER: Clearing the confusion. Milbank Q. 2010;88:256–276. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2010.00598.x. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources