Internal or External Word-of-Mouth (WOM), Why Do Patients Choose Doctors on Online Medical Services (OMSs) Single Platform in China?
- PMID: 36293874
- PMCID: PMC9603608
- DOI: 10.3390/ijerph192013293
Internal or External Word-of-Mouth (WOM), Why Do Patients Choose Doctors on Online Medical Services (OMSs) Single Platform in China?
Abstract
(1) Background: Word-of-mouth (WOM) can influence patients' choice of doctors in online medical services (OMSs). Previous studies have explored the relationship between internal WOM in online healthcare communities (OHCs) and patients' choice of doctors. There is a lack of research on external WOM and position ranking in OMSs. (2) Methods: We develop an empirical model based on the data of 4435 doctors from a leading online healthcare community in China. We discuss the influence of internal and external WOM on patients' choice of doctors in OMSs, exploring the interaction between internal and external WOM and the moderation of doctor position ranking. (3) Results: Both internal and external WOM had a positive impact on patients' choice of doctors; there was a significant positive interaction between internal and third-party generated WOM, but the interaction between internal and relative-generated WOM, and the interaction between internal and doctor-generated WOM were both nonsignificant. The position ranking of doctors significantly enhanced the impact of internal WOM, whereas it weakened the impact of doctor recommendations on patients' choice of doctors. (4) The results emphasize the importance of the research on external WOM in OMSs, and suggest that the moderation of internal WOM may be related to the credibility and accessibility of external WOM, and the impact of doctor position ranking can be explained by information search costs.
Keywords: external word-of-mouth; online medical service; optimal sequential search; position ranking.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Exploring the impact of word-of-mouth about Physicians' service quality on patient choice based on online health communities.BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2016 Nov 26;16(1):151. doi: 10.1186/s12911-016-0386-0. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2016. PMID: 27888834 Free PMC article.
-
A word-of-mouth perspective on consumers of family medicine services: a case study.J Med Life. 2022 May;15(5):655-660. doi: 10.25122/jml-2022-0098. J Med Life. 2022. PMID: 35815082 Free PMC article.
-
Exploring the Role of Online Health Community Information in Patients' Decisions to Switch from Online to Offline Medical Services.Int J Med Inform. 2019 Oct;130:103951. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2019.08.011. Epub 2019 Aug 13. Int J Med Inform. 2019. PMID: 31473534
-
The Impact of Narrative Reviews on Patient E-doctor Choice in Online Health Communities.Inquiry. 2023 Jan-Dec;60:469580231183695. doi: 10.1177/00469580231183695. Inquiry. 2023. PMID: 37357728 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The Voice of Chinese Health Consumers: A Text Mining Approach to Web-Based Physician Reviews.J Med Internet Res. 2016 May 10;18(5):e108. doi: 10.2196/jmir.4430. J Med Internet Res. 2016. PMID: 27165558 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Driving Online Healthcare Growth Amid the Digital Divide: How Trust in Professional Signals from Doctor Biographies Shapes Patient Decisions.Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Jun 13;13(12):1418. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13121418. Healthcare (Basel). 2025. PMID: 40565445 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Yang Y., Zhang X., Lee P.K.C. Improving the Effectiveness of Online Healthcare Platforms: An Empirical Study with Multi-Period Patient-Doctor Consultation Data. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2019;207:70–80. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2018.11.009. - DOI
-
- Guo X., Guo S., Vogel D., Li Y. Online Healthcare Community Interaction Dynamics. J. Manag. Sci. Eng. 2016;1:58–74. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1383.101004. - DOI
-
- Chu L.Y., Nazerzadeh H., Zhang H. Position Ranking and Auctions for Online Marketplaces. Manag. Sci. 2020;66:3617–3634. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.2019.3372. - DOI
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
- 71971123/the National Natural Science Foundation of China
- ZD2022077/the Funded by Science and Technology Project of Hebei Education Department
- ZB22BZ0324/the Scientific Research Projects of the Liberal Arts Development Fund of Nankai University
- JBKYXX2205/the Fundamental Research Funds for Hebei University of Technology
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources