Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Oct 11;8(10):1067.
doi: 10.3390/jof8101067.

Management of Filamentous Fungal Keratitis: A Pragmatic Approach

Affiliations
Review

Management of Filamentous Fungal Keratitis: A Pragmatic Approach

Jeremy J Hoffman et al. J Fungi (Basel). .

Abstract

Filamentous fungal infections of the cornea known as filamentous fungal keratitis (FK) are challenging to treat. Topical natamycin 5% is usually first-line treatment following the results of several landmark clinical trials. However, even when treated intensively, infections may progress to corneal perforation. Current topical antifungals are not always effective and are often unavailable. Alternatives topical therapies to natamycin include voriconazole, chlorhexidine, amphotericin B and econazole. Surgical therapy, typically in the form of therapeutic penetrating keratoplasty, may be required for severe cases or following corneal perforation. Alternative treatment strategies such as intrastromal or intracameral injections of antifungals may be used. However, there is often no clear treatment strategy and the evidence to guide therapy is often lacking. This review describes the different treatment options and their evidence and provides a pragmatic approach to the management of fungal keratitis, particularly for clinicians working in tropical, low-resource settings where fungal keratitis is most prevalent.

Keywords: antifungals; chlorhexidine; fungal keratitis; management; microbial keratitis; microbiology; natamycin.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Forest plot of topical natamycin 5% versus voriconazole 1% (outcome: best spectacle corrected visual acuity, logMAR). Reproduced from FlorCruz NV, Evans JR. Medical interventions for fungal keratitis. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2015; 4: CD004241 with permission from John Wiley and Sons [5].
Figure 2
Figure 2
Forest plot of topical natamycin 5% versus voriconazole 1% (outcome: corneal perforation). Reproduced from FlorCruz NV, Evans JR. Medical interventions for fungal keratitis. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2015; 4: CD004241 with permission from John Wiley and Sons [5].
Figure 3
Figure 3
Forest plot of topical natamycin 5% versus chlorhexidine 0.2% (outcome: clinical cure). Reproduced from FlorCruz NV, Evans JR. Medical interventions for fungal keratitis. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2015; 4: CD004241 with permission from John Wiley and Sons [5].
Figure 4
Figure 4
Progression of Fusarium fungal keratitis in a Tanzanian patient despite prompt treatment with topical natamycin 5%. First photograph, baseline presentation; second photograph, progression of infiltrate and increasing hypopyon at one week despite admission and intensive natamycin 5% treatment; third photograph, corneal perforation at three weeks following presentation.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Suggested treatment protocol for filamentous fungal keratitis. * Topical Natamycin 5% is first-line treatment but chlorhexidine 0.2% can be given if natamycin is unavailable. ** Targeted injection refers to either intrastromal/intracameral voriconazole/amphotericin B. *** Perforation includes descemetocele, impending, and frank corneal perforations. Adapted from the TST Protocol [76].

References

    1. Patil A., Lakhani P., Majumdar S. Current perspectives on natamycin in ocular fungal infections. J. Drug Deliv. Sci. Technol. 2017;41:206–212. doi: 10.1016/j.jddst.2017.07.015. - DOI
    1. Ghannoum M.A., Rice L.B. Antifungal agents: Mode of action, mechanisms of resistance, and correlation of these mechanisms with bacterial resistance. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 1999;12:501–517. doi: 10.1128/CMR.12.4.501. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Borelli C., Schaller M., Niewerth M., Nocker K., Baasner B., Berg D., Tiemann R., Tietjen K., Fugmann B., Lang-Fugmann S., et al. Modes of action of the new arylguanidine abafungin beyond interference with ergosterol biosynthesis and in vitro activity against medically important fungi. Chemotherapy. 2008;54:245–259. doi: 10.1159/000142334. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lakhani P., Patil A., Majumdar S. Challenges in the polyene- and azole-based pharmacotherapy of ocular fungal infections. J. Ocul. Pharmacol. Ther. 2019;35:6–22. doi: 10.1089/jop.2018.0089. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. FlorCruz N.V., Evans J.R. Medical interventions for fungal keratitis. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2015;4:CD004241. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004241.pub4. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources