Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Sep 23;12(10):1572.
doi: 10.3390/jpm12101572.

Sonographic Assessment of Uterine Biometry for the Diagnosis of Diffuse Adenomyosis in a Tertiary Outpatient Clinic

Affiliations

Sonographic Assessment of Uterine Biometry for the Diagnosis of Diffuse Adenomyosis in a Tertiary Outpatient Clinic

Diego Raimondo et al. J Pers Med. .

Abstract

Background: to compare several uterine biometric parameters at transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS) between adenomyosis and non-adenomyosis uteri and evaluate their role for the diagnosis of diffuse adenomyosis.

Methods: prospective observational study conducted between the 1 February 2022 and the 30 April 2022. In this case, 56 patients with TVUS diagnosis of adenomyosis were included. A 1:1 ratio age and parity-matched group of non-adenomyosis patients was selected. We compared sonographic uterine biometric parameters (longitudinal (LD), anteroposterior (APD) and transverse (TD) diameters, volume, simple and complex diameter ratios) and investigated their diagnostic performance.

Results: all sonographic parameters were significantly different between the study groups, except for TD/(LD+APD). Optimal cut-off values of APD and LD/APD showed the best sensitivity and specificity. APD diameter equal or superior to 39.5 mm (95% CI, 36.2-42.8) had sensitivity of 0.70 (95% CI, 0.57-0.80), specificity of 0.71 (95% CI, 0.59-0.82) and accuracy of 0.75 (95% CI, 0.66-0.84). LD/APD equal or inferior to 2.05 (95% CI, 1.96-2.13) showed sensitivity and specificity of 0.70 (95% CI, 0.57-0.80) each and accuracy of 0.72 (95% CI, 0.62-0.81).

Conclusions: several biometric uterine parameters at TVUS in fertile-aged women were statistically different between adenomyosis and non-adenomyosis uteri, though their optimal cut-off values showed low accuracy in diagnosing adenomyosis.

Keywords: adenomyosis; biometry; diagnosis; globular uterus; ultrasonography; ultrasound.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Standardized uterine measurement according to the MUSA consensus [2]. Longitudinal diameter (LD) is the entire uterine length measured as the sum of uterine corpus (Ut-L) and cervix length (Ut-Cervix L). Anteroposterior diameter (APD) and transverse diameter (TD) are measured in the sagittal (Ut-H) and transverse plane (Ut-W), respectively.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Box plots showing absolute uterine diameters and volume of the uterus, by presence or absence of adenomyosis. * p-value ≤ 0.05. Notes: The box represents the interquartile range (IQR), i.e., the distance between the 1st and the 3rd quartile (Q1, Q3); the bar and diamond inside the box represent the median and the mean, respectively; the whiskers represent the lower and upper adjacent values, i.e., the lowest observation ≥ Q1 − 1.5 × IQR and the largest observation ≤ Q3 + 1.5 × IQR; the circles represent the individual values observed outside the whiskers (outliers).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Box plots showing simple diameter ratios of the uterus, by presence or absence of adenomyosis. * p-value ≤ 0.05. Notes: The box represents the interquartile range (IQR), i.e., the distance between the 1st and the 3rd quartile (Q1, Q3); the bar and diamond inside the box represent the median and the mean, respectively; the whiskers represent the lower and upper adjacent values, i.e., the lowest observation ≥ Q1 − 1.5 × IQR and the largest observation ≤ Q3 + 1.5 × IQR; the circles represent the individual values observed outside the whiskers (outliers). Abbreviations: LD, longitudinal diameter; APD, antero-posterior diameter; TD, transverse diameter.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Box plots showing diameter sum and complex diameter ratios of the uterus, by presence or absence of adenomyosis. * p-value ≤0.05. Notes: The box represents the interquartile range (IQR), i.e., the distance between the 1st and the 3rd quartile (Q1, Q3); the bar and diamond inside the box represent the median and the mean, respectively; the whiskers represent the lower and upper adjacent values, i.e., the lowest observation ≥ Q1 − 1.5 × IQR and the largest observation ≤ Q3 + 1.5 × IQR; the circles represent the individual values observed outside the whiskers (outliers). Abbreviations: LD, longitudinal diameter; APD, antero-posterior diameter; TD, transverse diameter.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Cunningham R.K., Horrow M.M., Smith R.J., Springer J. Adenomyosis: A Sonographic Diagnosis. RadioGraphics. 2018;38:1576–1589. doi: 10.1148/rg.2018180080. - DOI - PubMed
    1. van den Bosch T., Dueholm M., Leone F.P.G., Valentin L., Rasmussen C.K., Votino A., Van Schoubroeck D., Landolfo C., Installé A.J., Guerriero S., et al. Terms, definitions and measurements to describe sonographic features of myometrium and uterine masses: A consensus opinion from the Morphological Uterus Sonographic Assessment (MUSA) group. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2015;46:284–298. doi: 10.1002/uog.14806. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Van den Bosch T., de Bruijn A.M., de Leeuw R.A., Dueholm M., Exacoustos C., Valentin L., Bourne T., Timmerman D., Huirne J.A.F. Sonographic classification and reporting system for diagnosing adenomyosis. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2019;53:576–582. doi: 10.1002/uog.19096. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Exacoustos C., Morosetti G., Conway F., Camilli S., Martire F.G., Lazzeri L., Piccione E., Zupi E. New Sonographic Clas-sification of Adenomyosis: Do Type and Degree of Adenomyosis Correlate to Severity of Symptoms? J. Minim. Invasive Gynecol. 2020;27:1308–1315. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2019.09.788. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Harada T., Khine Y.M., Kaponis A., Nikellis T., Decavalas G., Taniguchi F. The Impact of Adenomyosis on Women’s Fertility. Obstet. Gynecol. Survey. 2016;71:557–568. doi: 10.1097/OGX.0000000000000346. - DOI - PMC - PubMed