Depressive Symptoms in Expecting Fathers: Is Paternal Perinatal Depression a Valid Concept? A Systematic Review of Evidence
- PMID: 36294737
- PMCID: PMC9605090
- DOI: 10.3390/jpm12101598
Depressive Symptoms in Expecting Fathers: Is Paternal Perinatal Depression a Valid Concept? A Systematic Review of Evidence
Abstract
Background: Since the identification of Couvade syndrome in the late 1950s, little attention has been dedicated to the issue of depression in expecting fathers.
Objective: To quantify the extent of depression in expecting fathers and find out if they match their pregnant partners' depression.
Methods: We conducted a PubMed and ClinicalTrials.gov search using paternal depression and all its variants as terms. We used the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 statement to include eligible studies.
Results: We identified a grand total of 1443 articles, of which 204 were eligible. The total number of fathers/expecting fathers involved was 849,913. Longitudinal studies represented more than half of the included studies; more than three-quarters of the studies used the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS). The average occurrence of paternal depression was around 5%, which confers the entity some clinical dignity. Depression tends to occur more in expecting women and new mothers than in expecting partners or new fathers, while the co-occurrence in the same couple is quite low.
Limitations: The methodological heterogeneity of the included studies prevents us from meta-analyzing the obtained data. The validity of the instruments used is another issue.
Conclusions: Paternal depression is distinct from maternal depression and occurs at lower rates (about half). The very existence of a paternal depression clinical entity is beyond any doubt. Future research should address methodological heterogeneity.
Keywords: couvade syndrome; expecting fathers; gender; paternal; peripartum depression; personalized approach to the patient; pregnancy.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Figures
References
-
- Plot R. The Natural History of Oxford-Shire: Being an Essay toward The Natural History of England. The Theater in Oxford; Oxford, UK: 1677. p. 193.
-
- Hume D. In: Essays, Moral, Political, and Literary, Vol. 1, Essay I. of the Delicacy of Taste and Passion. Fleming R., Alison A., Kincaid A., editors. The Library of Economics and Liberty; Edinburgh, Scotland: 1741.
-
- Hippocratis, Opera Omnia, Ex Jani Cornarii Versione, Una cum Jo . Qua Quid Præstitum Fit, Ad Tomum Primum Præfatio Docebit. Typographia Radiciana; Venice, Italy: 1737. Marinelli Commentariis, Petri Matthæi Pini Indice, Singula Singulis Tomis. Nova et Accuratissima Editio.
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources