Satisfaction with Surgical Procedures and Bladder Management of Chronic Spinal Cord Injured Patients with Voiding Dysfunction Who Desire Spontaneous Voiding
- PMID: 36294890
- PMCID: PMC9604585
- DOI: 10.3390/jpm12101751
Satisfaction with Surgical Procedures and Bladder Management of Chronic Spinal Cord Injured Patients with Voiding Dysfunction Who Desire Spontaneous Voiding
Abstract
We aimed to investigate treatment outcome and satisfaction with bladder outlet surgeries and bladder management in patients with spinal cord injury (SCI), voiding dysfunction, and to seek a spontaneous voiding or reflex voiding program. A total of 261 patients were included in this retrospective study. The mean age at surgical procedure was 49.2 ± 15.9 years; the median follow-up period was 11 (IQR 6, 17) years; 119 received a urethral Botox injection, 41 underwent transurethral incision of the bladder neck (TUI-BN), 77 underwent transurethral incision or resection of the prostate (TUI-P or TUR-P), and 24 had an external sphincterotomy. Satisfactory surgical outcome was reported by 80.5% of patients undergoing TUI-BN, 70.8% undergoing external sphincterotomy, 64.9% receiving TUI-P or TUR-P, and 59.7% receiving the urethral Botox injection. Persistent dysuria was the most common reason for dissatisfaction after the urethral Botox injection (73.1%) and TUI-BN (58.5%). Recurrent urinary tract infection continued in most patients after any type of surgery (all >75%). Most patients with SCI were satisfied with their initial bladder outlet operation in facilitating spontaneous voiding. However, repeat, or multiple surgical interventions were needed in 65.5% of SCI patients to achieve satisfactory voiding. A correct diagnosis is very important before every intervention and bladder management to reach the best satisfaction. VUDS is suggested before surgical procedures to ensure efficacy, even in patients with the same level of SCI.
Keywords: bladder management; bladder outlet operation; patient satisfaction; spinal cord injury; voiding dysfunction.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
-
- Gajewski J.B., Schurch B., Hamid R., Aerbeck M., Sakakibara R., Agrò E.F., Dickinson T., Payne C.K., Drake M.J., Haylen B.T. An International Continence Society (ICS) report on the terminology for adult neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction (ANLUTD) Neurourol. Urodyn. 2018;37:1152–1161. doi: 10.1002/nau.23397. - DOI - PubMed
-
- D’Ancona C., Haylen B., Oelke M., Abranches-Monteiro L., Arnold E., Goldman H., Hamid R., Homma Y., Marcelissen T., Rademakers K., et al. The International Continence Society (ICS) report on the terminology for adult male lower urinary tract and pelvic floor symptoms and dysfunction. Neurourol. Urodyn. 2019;38:433–477. doi: 10.1002/nau.23897. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Abrams P., Cardozo L., Fall M., Griffiths D., Rosier P., Ulmsten U., van Kerrebroeck P., Victor A., Wein A., Standardisation Sub-committee of the International Continence Society The standardisation of terminology of lower urinary tract function: Report from the Standardisation Sub-committee of the International Continence Society. Neurourol. Urodyn. 2002;21:167–178. doi: 10.1002/nau.10052. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Chen S.F., Jiang Y.H., Jhang J.F., Lee C.L., Kuo H.C. Bladder management and urological complications in patients with chronic spinal cord injuries in Taiwan. Tzu Chi Med. J. 2014;26:25–28.
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
