Advantage of Using of High-Sensitivity Troponin I Compared to Conventional Troponin I in Shortening Time to Rule out/in Acute Coronary Syndrome in Chest Pain Patients Presenting to the Emergency Department
- PMID: 36295552
- PMCID: PMC9608198
- DOI: 10.3390/medicina58101391
Advantage of Using of High-Sensitivity Troponin I Compared to Conventional Troponin I in Shortening Time to Rule out/in Acute Coronary Syndrome in Chest Pain Patients Presenting to the Emergency Department
Abstract
Background and Objectives: We aimed to compare the time to diagnosis for acute coronary syndromes using high-sensitivity troponin I (hsTnI) and conventional troponin I (TnI) in patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with chest pain. Materials and Methods: This was an observational prospective study involving patients presenting to the ED of Sant’Andrea Hospital University la Sapienza in Rome (Italy) with chest pain from January to December 2014. Serum troponin was drawn at presentation, and at 3, 6, 9, and/or 12 h if clinically indicated. Depending on date of recruitment, patients had either hsTnI (Abbott Laboratories) or TnI (Abbott Laboratories) performed. The primary endpoint was the time to diagnosis at index visit. Results: A total of 1059 patients were recruited, (673 [63.6%] male, median age 60 years [interquartile range 49−73 years]), out of whom 898 (84.8%) patients were evaluated with hsTnI and 161 (15.2%) with TnI. A total of 393 (37.1%) patients had the diagnosis of acute coronary syndrome in ED. The median time to diagnosis for those evaluated with TnI was 400 min, IQR 120−720 min, while the use of hsTnI led to a significantly shorter time to diagnosis (median 200 min, IQR 100−200 min, p < 0.001). Conclusions: This study confirms that in patients presenting to the emergency department with chest pain, the use of hsTnI is associated with a reduced time to ruling in/out ACS, and, consequently, hsTnI should be routinely used over TnI for more rapid identification of ACS with benefits for patients and related costs.
Keywords: acute coronary syndrome; emergency department; high-sensitivity troponin I; time to diagnosis.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Validation of high-sensitivity troponin I in a 2-hour diagnostic strategy to assess 30-day outcomes in emergency department patients with possible acute coronary syndrome.J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 Oct 1;62(14):1242-1249. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.02.078. Epub 2013 Apr 10. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013. PMID: 23583250 Clinical Trial.
-
hs-Troponin I Followed by CT Angiography Improves Acute Coronary Syndrome Risk Stratification Accuracy and Work-Up in Acute Chest Pain Patients: Results From ROMICAT II Trial.JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015 Nov;8(11):1272-1281. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2015.06.016. Epub 2015 Oct 14. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015. PMID: 26476506 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
A multicenter comparison of established and emerging cardiac biomarkers for the diagnostic evaluation of chest pain in the emergency department.Am Heart J. 2011 Aug;162(2):276-282.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2011.05.022. Am Heart J. 2011. PMID: 21835288 Clinical Trial.
-
Diagnostic accuracy of functional, imaging and biochemical tests for patients presenting with chest pain to the emergency department: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2019 Aug;8(5):412-420. doi: 10.1177/2048872617754275. Epub 2018 Jan 19. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2019. PMID: 29350536
-
Initial Evaluation and Management of Patients Presenting with Acute Chest Pain in the Emergency Department.Curr Cardiol Rep. 2023 Dec;25(12):1677-1686. doi: 10.1007/s11886-023-01984-6. Epub 2023 Oct 27. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2023. PMID: 37889421 Review.
Cited by
-
A patient-centric chest pain management approach utilizing a high sensitivity Troponin-I assay.Heliyon. 2024 Sep 28;10(20):e38164. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e38164. eCollection 2024 Oct 30. Heliyon. 2024. PMID: 39498071 Free PMC article.
-
Usefulness of High-Sensitivity Troponin I in Risk Stratification and Final Disposition of Patients with Acute Heart Failure in the Emergency Department: Comparison between HFpEF vs. HFrEF.Medicina (Kaunas). 2022 Dec 20;59(1):7. doi: 10.3390/medicina59010007. Medicina (Kaunas). 2022. PMID: 36676630 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Cairns C., Kang K. National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: 2019 Emergency Department Summary Tables. [(accessed on 17 August 2022)]; doi: 10.15620/cdc:115748. Available online: https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/115748. - DOI
-
- Gimenez M.R., Twerenbold R., Reichlin T., Wildi K., Haaf P., Schaefer M., Zellweger C., Moehring B., Stallone F., Sou S.M., et al. Direct comparison of high-sensitivity-cardiac troponin I vs. T for the early diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction. Eur. Heart J. 2014;35:2303–2311. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehu188. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Collet J.-P., Thiele H., Barbato E., Barthélémy O., Bauersachs J., Bhatt D.L., Dendale P., Dorobantu M., Edvardsen T., Folliguet T., et al. 2020 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation: The Task Force for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Eur. Heart J. 2021;42:1289–1367. doi: 10.1093/EURHEARTJ/EHAA575. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Than M., Cullen L., Reid C.M., Lim S.H., Aldous S., Ardagh M.W., Peacock W.F., Parsonage W.A., Ho H.F., Kasliwal R.R., et al. A 2-h diagnostic protocol to assess patients with chest pain symptoms in the Asia-Pacific region (ASPECT): A prospective observational validation study. Lancet. 2011;377:1077–1084. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60310-3. - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources