Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2022 Oct 4;58(10):1391.
doi: 10.3390/medicina58101391.

Advantage of Using of High-Sensitivity Troponin I Compared to Conventional Troponin I in Shortening Time to Rule out/in Acute Coronary Syndrome in Chest Pain Patients Presenting to the Emergency Department

Affiliations
Observational Study

Advantage of Using of High-Sensitivity Troponin I Compared to Conventional Troponin I in Shortening Time to Rule out/in Acute Coronary Syndrome in Chest Pain Patients Presenting to the Emergency Department

Ziwei Lin et al. Medicina (Kaunas). .

Abstract

Background and Objectives: We aimed to compare the time to diagnosis for acute coronary syndromes using high-sensitivity troponin I (hsTnI) and conventional troponin I (TnI) in patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with chest pain. Materials and Methods: This was an observational prospective study involving patients presenting to the ED of Sant’Andrea Hospital University la Sapienza in Rome (Italy) with chest pain from January to December 2014. Serum troponin was drawn at presentation, and at 3, 6, 9, and/or 12 h if clinically indicated. Depending on date of recruitment, patients had either hsTnI (Abbott Laboratories) or TnI (Abbott Laboratories) performed. The primary endpoint was the time to diagnosis at index visit. Results: A total of 1059 patients were recruited, (673 [63.6%] male, median age 60 years [interquartile range 49−73 years]), out of whom 898 (84.8%) patients were evaluated with hsTnI and 161 (15.2%) with TnI. A total of 393 (37.1%) patients had the diagnosis of acute coronary syndrome in ED. The median time to diagnosis for those evaluated with TnI was 400 min, IQR 120−720 min, while the use of hsTnI led to a significantly shorter time to diagnosis (median 200 min, IQR 100−200 min, p < 0.001). Conclusions: This study confirms that in patients presenting to the emergency department with chest pain, the use of hsTnI is associated with a reduced time to ruling in/out ACS, and, consequently, hsTnI should be routinely used over TnI for more rapid identification of ACS with benefits for patients and related costs.

Keywords: acute coronary syndrome; emergency department; high-sensitivity troponin I; time to diagnosis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The difference in median time to diagnosis between hsTnI and cTnI for various final diagnoses: (a) time to diagnosis for all patients, (b) time to diagnosis for NSTEMI, (c) time to diagnosis for unstable angina, and (d) time to diagnosis for non-ACS chest pain.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Cairns C., Kang K. National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: 2019 Emergency Department Summary Tables. [(accessed on 17 August 2022)]; doi: 10.15620/cdc:115748. Available online: https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/115748. - DOI
    1. Gimenez M.R., Twerenbold R., Reichlin T., Wildi K., Haaf P., Schaefer M., Zellweger C., Moehring B., Stallone F., Sou S.M., et al. Direct comparison of high-sensitivity-cardiac troponin I vs. T for the early diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction. Eur. Heart J. 2014;35:2303–2311. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehu188. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Collet J.-P., Thiele H., Barbato E., Barthélémy O., Bauersachs J., Bhatt D.L., Dendale P., Dorobantu M., Edvardsen T., Folliguet T., et al. 2020 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation: The Task Force for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Eur. Heart J. 2021;42:1289–1367. doi: 10.1093/EURHEARTJ/EHAA575. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Than M., Cullen L., Reid C.M., Lim S.H., Aldous S., Ardagh M.W., Peacock W.F., Parsonage W.A., Ho H.F., Kasliwal R.R., et al. A 2-h diagnostic protocol to assess patients with chest pain symptoms in the Asia-Pacific region (ASPECT): A prospective observational validation study. Lancet. 2011;377:1077–1084. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60310-3. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Høilund-Carlsen P.F., Johansen A., Vach W., Christensen H.W., Møldrup M., Haghfelt T. High probability of disease in angina pectoris patients: Is clinical estimation reliable? Can. J. Cardiol. 2007;23:641–647. doi: 10.1016/S0828-282X(07)70226-X. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources