Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Oct 20;10(10):1757.
doi: 10.3390/vaccines10101757.

Post-Vaccination Neutralization Responses to Omicron Sub-Variants

Affiliations
Review

Post-Vaccination Neutralization Responses to Omicron Sub-Variants

Henning Jacobsen et al. Vaccines (Basel). .

Abstract

Background: The emergence of the Omicron variant (B.1.1.529), which correlated with dramatic losses in cross-neutralization capacity of post-vaccination sera, raised concerns about the effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines against infection and disease. Several clinically relevant sub-variants subsequently emerged rapidly.

Methods: We evaluated published and pre-print studies reporting sub-variant specific reductions in cross-neutralization compared to the prototype strain of SARS-CoV-2 and between sub-variants. Median fold-reduction across studies was calculated by sub-variant and vaccine platform.

Results: Among 178 studies with post-vaccination data, after primary vaccination the sub-variant specific fold-reduction in neutralization capacity compared to the prototype antigen varied widely, from median 4.2-fold for BA.3 to 40.1-fold for BA.2.75; in boosted participants fold-reduction was similar for most sub-variants (5.3-fold to 7.0-fold); however, a more pronounced fold-change was observed for sub-variants related to BA.4 and BA.5 (10.4-fold to 14.2-fold). Relative to BA.1, the other Omicron sub-variants had similar neutralization capacity post-primary vaccination (range median 0.8-fold to 1.1-fold) and post-booster (0.9-fold to 1.4-fold) except for BA.4/5-related sub-variants which was higher (2.1-fold to 2.7-fold). Omicron sub-variant-specific responder rates were low post-primary vaccination (range median 28.0% to 65.9%) compared to the prototype (median 100%) but improved post-booster (range median 73.3% to 100%).

Conclusions: Fold-reductions in neutralization titers were comparable post-booster except for sub-variants related to BA.4 and BA.5, which had higher fold-reduction. Assessment after primary vaccination was not possible because of overall poor neutralization responses causing extreme heterogeneity. Considering large fold-decreases in neutralization titers relative to the parental strain for all Omicron sub-variants, vaccine effectiveness is very likely to be reduced against all Omicron sub-variants, and probably more so against variants related to BA.4 or BA.5.

Keywords: COVID-19 vaccine; Omicron; SARS-CoV-2; neutralization; sub-variant.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

M.M.H. reports research grants from Pfizer for unrelated work; M.D.K. reports research grants from Pfizer and Merck and consultancy fees from Merck, all for unrelated work; N.B.-Z. reports research grants from Merck, from Johnson & Johnson and from Serum Institute of India, all for unrelated work; and consulting fees from Merck for unrelated work.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Overview of literature search and study selection process.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Fold-reduction in neutralization titers relative to the prototype strain for Omicron sub-variants. Primary (A,B) series vaccination or first boost vaccination (C,D), color coded by platform (A,C) or stratified for studies providing multiple variant-specific, paired observations (B,D). Every data point represents one observation. Median, IQR and group size is shown. n.d. no data.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Relative fold-reduction in neutralization titers across Omicron sub-variants. Reported fold-change in neutralization titers of Omicron sub-variants compared to Omicron BA.1 (A) and for each sub-variant to each-other (B). Only studies with at least two sub-variant specific and matched observations are shown. Median and IQR (upper right corner) and number of paired observations (lower left corner) is shown. n.d. = no data.

References

    1. Walker A.S., Vihta K.-D., Gethings O., Pritchard E., Jones J., House T., Bell I., Bell J., Newton J.N., Farrar J. Tracking the Emergence of SARS-CoV-2 Alpha Variant in the United Kingdom. N. Engl. J. Med. 2021;385:2582–2585. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc2103227. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. WHO Weekly Epidemiological Update on COVID-19–29 June 2022. 2022. [(accessed on 1 October 2022)]. Available online: https://www.who.int/publications/m/item/weekly-epidemiological-update-on....
    1. Edara V.V., Manning K.E., Ellis M., Lai L., Moore K.M., Foster S.L., Floyd K., Daves-Gardner M.E., Mantus G., Nyhoff L.E. mRNA-1273 and BNT162b2 mRNA vaccines have reduced neutralizing activity against the SARS-CoV-2 omicron variant. Cell Rep. Med. 2022;3:100529. doi: 10.1016/j.xcrm.2022.100529. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cameroni E., Bowen J.E., Rosen L.E., Saliba C., Zepeda S.K., Culap K., Pinto D., Van Blargan L.A., De Marco A., di Iulio J. Broadly neutralizing antibodies overcome SARS-CoV-2 Omicron antigenic shift. Nature. 2022;602:664–670. doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-04386-2. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cheng S.M.S., Mok C.K.P., Leung Y.W.Y., Ng S.S., Chan K.C.K., Ko F.W., Chen C., Yio K., Lam B.H.S., Lau E.H.Y. Neutralizing antibodies against the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant BA.1 following homologous and heterologous CoronaVac or BNT162b2 vaccination. Nat. Med. 2022;28:486–489. doi: 10.1038/s41591-022-01704-7. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources