Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Oct 24;8(4):00313-2022.
doi: 10.1183/23120541.00313-2022. eCollection 2022 Oct.

Haemodynamic effects of initial combination therapy in pulmonary arterial hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Affiliations

Haemodynamic effects of initial combination therapy in pulmonary arterial hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Ioannis T Farmakis et al. ERJ Open Res. .

Abstract

Background: Although the initial use of combination treatment has been proven to be beneficial for patients' clinical outcomes, there are scarce data on its haemodynamic effects. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the effect of an initial combination of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH)-targeted therapies on haemodynamic parameters in treatment-naïve PAH patients.

Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Web of Science was performed. We considered eligible studies with an intervention of initial PAH-targeted combination therapy in treatment-naïve PAH patients with or without monotherapy control. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed for the difference between baseline and follow-up in pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) and other haemodynamic parameters.

Results: In 880 patients receiving initial combination therapy PVR was reduced by -6.5 Wood Units (95% CI -7.4--5.7 Wood Units) or by -52% (95% CI -56%--48%, I2=0%) compared to baseline. Initial triple therapy including a parenteral prostanoid resulted in significantly greater PVR reduction (-67% versus -50% with all other combination therapies, p=0.01). The effect was more pronounced in younger patients (p=0.02). Compared to baseline, there was -12.2 mmHg (95% CI -14.0--10.4 mmHg) decrease in mean pulmonary artery pressure, 0.9 L·min-1·m-2 (95% CI 0.8-1.1 L·min-1·m-2) increase in cardiac index, -3.2 mmHg (95% CI -4.1--2.3 mmHg) decrease in right atrial pressure and 8.6% (95% CI 6.9-10.3%) increase in mixed venous oxygen saturation. In the controlled studies, initial combination therapy reduced PVR by -4.2 Wood Units (95% CI -6.1--2.4 Wood Units) compared to monotherapy.

Conclusion: Initial combination therapy leads to remarkable haemodynamic amelioration. Parenteral prostanoids should be considered early, especially in more severely affected patients, to enable right ventricular reverse remodelling.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest: I.T. Farmakis has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: E. Vrana has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: S-A. Mouratoglou has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: S. Zafeiropoulos has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: S. Zanos has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: G. Giannakoulas has received fees for lectures and/or consultation from Actelion, Bayer, ELPEN Pharmaceuticals, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, MSD, Pfizer, Lilly and United Therapeutics.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Forest plot of the effects of initial combination therapy on the pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) expressed as percentage difference compared to baseline. TE: treatment effect; seTE: standard error of treatment effect; MD: mean difference.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Effects of upfront combination therapy on haemodynamic outcomes in the single-arm meta-analysis. MD: mean difference; PVR: pulmonary vascular resistance; mPAP: mean pulmonary arterial pressure; RAP: right atrial pressure; SvO2: mixed venous oxygen saturation.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Bubble plot for the effect of participants’ mean age on the pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) outcome.

References

    1. Galiè N, Channick RN, Frantz RP, et al. . Risk stratification and medical therapy of pulmonary arterial hypertension. Eur Respir J 2019; 53: 1801899. doi:10.1183/13993003.01889-2018 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Humbert M, Kovacs G, Hoeper MM, et al. . 2022 ESC/ERS guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of pulmonary hypertension. Eur Heart J 2022; 53: 1801913. 10.1093/eurheartj/ehac237. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Galiè N, Barberà JA, Frost AE, et al. . Initial use of ambrisentan plus tadalafil in pulmonary arterial hypertension. N Engl J Med 2015; 373: 834–844. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1413687 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, et al. . Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med 2009; 6: e1000097. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sterne JA, Hernán MA, Reeves BC, et al. . ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions. BMJ 2016; 355: i4919. doi:10.1136/bmj.i4919 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources