Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Oct 23;14(10):e30607.
doi: 10.7759/cureus.30607. eCollection 2022 Oct.

Real-Life Experience of the Prognostic Significance of the Primary Tumor Location on the Timing of Colorectal Liver Metastases: A Retrospective Analysis

Affiliations

Real-Life Experience of the Prognostic Significance of the Primary Tumor Location on the Timing of Colorectal Liver Metastases: A Retrospective Analysis

Carlo Signorelli et al. Cureus. .

Abstract

Background Numerous research studies have looked into how the primary tumor location (PTL) affects patients' prognosis for colorectal cancer (CRC). Our research aimed to investigate the prognostic effects of PTL in patients with synchronous (SM) and metachronous (MM) colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRCLM). Material and methods From 2016 to 2021, we looked back at the records of patients at our institute who were affected by CRCLM. Results 109 patients were included, of whom 21.1% received CRCLM resection (R0=73.9%), with 57.7% having left-sided colon cancer (LCC) and 42.2% having right-sided colon cancer (RCC). SM predominated (69.7%). The median duration of follow-up was 21,3 months (95%CI=15,4-25,2). ≥5 hepatic metastases prevailed in the SM group (N=61; 83.5%). 21% of all patients underwent CRCLM resection (R0=78.2%). We observed a double rate of patients unresponsive to standard systemic antineoplastic treatments in the SM group (35.8% vs. 17.9% of the MM group) (p=0.27). We found a significantly longer median overall survival (OS) in patients with MM-LCC compared with the other groups (27.7 months; HR=0.3797; 95%CI=0.19-0.74; p=0.0205). The median OS, regardless of PTL, was higher in the MM group (16,5 months vs. 16,1 months; HR=0,29; 95%CI=0,13-0,67; p=0.0038) as well as progression-free survival (PFS) (11 months vs. 10,2 months; HR=0,61; 95%CI=0,33-1,12; p=0.11). Finally, in patients undergoing liver surgery, a noteworthy median OS was shown to be significantly in favor of patients with metachronous liver metastases from the primary left tumor (37.0 months; HR=0.47; 95%CI=0.11-1.96; p=0.0041). Conclusions Our real-life study demonstrated that patients with LCC, particularly MM-LCC, have the highest survival and that the timing of CRCLM should be a prognostic factor.

Keywords: colorectal cancer; hepatic metastases; metachronous liver metastases; primary tumor location; synchronous liver metastases.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Flowchart showing the criteria for inclusion and exclusion
Figure 2
Figure 2. Kaplan-Meier curves of Overall Survival stratified by primary tumor location and timing of liver metastases.
SM-RCC, synchronous metastases from right-sided colon cancer; SM-LCC, synchronous metastases from left-sided colon cancer; MM-RCC, metachronous metastases from right-sided colon cancer; MM-LCC, metachronous metastases from left-sided colon cancer
Figure 3
Figure 3. Kaplan-Meier curves of Progression-Free Survival stratified by primary tumor location and timing of liver metastases.
SM-RCC, synchronous metastases from right-sided colon cancer; SM-LCC, synchronous metastases from left-sided colon cancer; MM-RCC, metachronous metastases from right-sided colon cancer; MM-LCC, metachronous metastases from left-sided colon cancer
Figure 4
Figure 4. Kaplan-Meier curves of Overall Survival stratified by timing of liver metastases.
SM, synchronous metastases; MM, metachronous metastases
Figure 5
Figure 5. Kaplan-Meier curves of Progression-Free Survival stratified by timing of liver metastases.
SM, synchronous metastases; MM, metachronous metastases
Figure 6
Figure 6. Kaplan-Meier curves of Overall Survival in patients after curative-intent surgery for colorectal cancer liver metastases stratified by primary tumor location and timing of liver metastases.
SM-RCC, synchronous metastases from right-sided colon cancer; SM-LCC, synchronous metastases from left-sided colon cancer; MM-RCC, metachronous metastases from right-sided colon cancer; MM-LCC, metachronous metastases from left-sided colon cancer
Figure 7
Figure 7. Kaplan-Meier curves of Progression-Free Survival in patients after curative-intent surgery for colorectal cancer liver metastases stratified by primary tumor location and timing of liver metastases.
SM-RCC, synchronous metastases from right-sided colon cancer; SM-LCC, synchronous metastases from left-sided colon cancer; MM-RCC, metachronous metastases from right-sided colon cancer; MM-LCC, metachronous metastases from left-sided colon cancer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. IARC World Health Organization, © International Agency for Research on Cancer; [ Oct; 2022 ]. 2020. Colorectal Cancer Fact Sheet | GLOBOSCAN 2020 | International Agency for Research on Cancer.
    1. Surgical treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. Chakedis J, Schmidt CR. Surg Oncol Clin N Am. 2018;27:377–399. - PubMed
    1. ESMO consensus guidelines for the management of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Van Cutsem E, Cervantes A, Adam R, et al. Ann Oncol. 2016;27:1386–1422. - PubMed
    1. Multimodal treatment strategies for colorectal liver metastases. Birrer DL, Tschuor C, Reiner C, et al. Swiss Med Wkly. 2021;151:0. - PubMed
    1. Lymphangiogenic gene expression is associated with lymph node recurrence and poor prognosis after partial hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastasis. Vellinga TT, Kranenburg O, Frenkel N, et al. Ann Surg. 2017;266:765–771. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources