Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Feb;38(2):208-214.
doi: 10.1177/08850666221134262. Epub 2022 Oct 26.

Agitation is a Common Barrier to Recovery of ICU Patients

Affiliations

Agitation is a Common Barrier to Recovery of ICU Patients

Niall T Prendergast et al. J Intensive Care Med. 2023 Feb.

Abstract

Importance: Agitation is common in mechanically ventilated ICU patients, but little is known about physician attitudes regarding agitation in this setting. Objectives: To characterize physician attitudes regarding agitation in mechanically ventilated ICU patients. Design, Setting, and Participants: We surveyed critical care physicians within a multicenter health system in Western Pennsylvania, assessing attitudes regarding agitation during mechanical ventilation and use of and confidence in agitation management options. We used quantitative clinical vignettes to determine whether agitation influences confidence regarding readiness for extubation. We sent our survey to 332 critical care physicians, of whom 80 (24%) responded and 69 were eligible (had cared for a mechanically ventilated patient in the preceding three months). Main Outcomes and Measures: Respondent confidence in patient readiness for extubation (0-100%, continuous) and frequency of use and confidence in management options (1-5, Likert). Results: Of 69 eligible responders, 61 (88%) agreed agitation is common and 49 (71%) agreed agitation is a barrier to extubation, but only 27 (39%) agreed their approach to agitation is evidence-based. Attitudes regarding agitation did not differ much by practice setting or physician demographics, though respondents working in medical ICUs were more likely (P = .04) and respondents trained in surgery or emergency medicine were less likely (P = .03) than others to indicate that agitation is an extubation barrier. Fifty-three (77%) respondents reported they frequently use non-pharmacologic measures to treat agitation, and 42 (70%) of those who reported they used non-pharmacologic measures during the prior 3 months indicated confidence in their effectiveness. In responses to clinical vignettes, confidence in patient's readiness for extubation was significantly lower if the patient was agitated (P < .001) or tachypneic (P < .001), but the presence of both agitation and tachypnea did not reduce confidence compared with tachypnea alone (P = .24). Conclusions and Relevance: Most critical care physicians consider agitation during mechanical ventilation a common problem and agreed that agitation is a barrier to extubation. Treatment practice varies widely.

Keywords: airway extubation; cross-sectional studies; physicians; practice patterns; psychomotor agitation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Financial Disclosures and Conflicts of Interest:

The other authors (NTP, CAO, KMP, PJT, AET) have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Box-and-whisker plots of respondent critical care physicians’ self-reported confidence in the extubation of standardized vignette patients of varying respiratory rates (RR) and levels of agitation, as measured by the Riker Sedation-Agitation Scale (SAS). Among non-tachypneic patients, any increase in agitation is associated with a significant decrement in extubation confidence (p < 0.001). There are significant differences in extubation confidence between tachypneic and non-tachypneic patients at all levels of agitation. Among tachypneic patients, changes in agitation are not associated with significant changes in extubation confidence.

Comment in

References

    1. Wunsch H, Linde-Zwirble WT, Angus DC, Hartman ME, Milbrandt EB, Kahn JM. The epidemiology of mechanical ventilation use in the United States. Crit Care Med 2010;38(10):1947–53. DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181ef4460. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Prendergast NT, Tiberio PJ, Girard TD. Treatment of delirium during critical illness. Annu Rev Med 2022;73:407–421. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-med-042220-013015. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. American Psychiatric Association., American Psychiatric Association. DSM-5 Task Force. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders : DSM-5. 5th ed. Washington, D.C.: American Psychiatric Association, 2013.
    1. Ely EW, Shintani A, Truman B, et al. Delirium as a predictor of mortality in mechanically ventilated patients in the intensive care unit. JAMA 2004;291(14):1753–62. DOI: 10.1001/jama.291.14.1753. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Girard TD, Jackson JC, Pandharipande PP, et al. Delirium as a predictor of long-term cognitive impairment in survivors of critical illness. Crit Care Med 2010;38(7):1513–20. DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181e47be1. - DOI - PMC - PubMed