Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comment
. 2023:12:7422.
doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2022.7422. Epub 2022 Oct 4.

Ways to Improve Hospital Quality - A Health System Perspective Comment on "Hospitals Bending the Cost Curve With Increased Quality: A Scoping Review Into Integrated Hospital Strategies"

Affiliations
Comment

Ways to Improve Hospital Quality - A Health System Perspective Comment on "Hospitals Bending the Cost Curve With Increased Quality: A Scoping Review Into Integrated Hospital Strategies"

Ansgar Wuebker. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2023.

Abstract

Wackers and colleagues' scoping review provides an informative and well-structured overview of hospital-based case studies focusing on integrated hospital strategies that seek to improve quality, while reducing or containing costs. Wackers et al take a hospital level perspective and evaluate facilitators and barriers to the successful implementation of those hospital strategies. I complement the hospital level perspective of Wackers et al with an analysis from a health system perspective. Regulations at the superordinate system level might influence decisions at the hospital level that are relevant for costs and quality of care. In this commentary, I discuss how interventions at the system level might affect hospital quality. The results suggest that especially competition between hospitals, pay for performance (PfP) initiatives in combination with publication of quality information, but also greater experience of hospital staff (as proxied by the volume outcome relationship) may provide impulses for improving quality of care.

Keywords: Competition; Health System; Hospital Quality; Pro-Market Reforms; Volume-Outcome.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Author declares that he has no competing interests.

Comment on

References

    1. Wackers E, Stadhouders N, Heil A, Westert G, van Dulmen S, Jeurissen P. Hospitals bending the cost curve with increased quality: a scoping review into integrated hospital strategies. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2022;11(11):2381–2391. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2021.168. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brekke KR, Canta C, Siciliani L, Straume OR. Hospital competition in a national health service: Evidence from a patient choice reform. J Health Econ. 2021;79:102509. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2021.102509. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gaynor M, Town RJ. Competition in health care markets. In: Pauly M, McGuire T, Barros PP, Eds. Handbook of Health Economics. Vol. 9. North-Holland. 2011:499-637.
    1. Gaynor M, Ho K, Town RJ. The industrial organization of health care markets. J Econ Lit. 2015;53:235–284. doi: 10.1257/jel.53.2.235. - DOI
    1. Kessler D, McClellan M. Is hospital competition socially wasteful? Q J Econ. 2000;115:577–615. doi: 10.1162/003355300554863. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources