Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Jan;23(1):63-69.
doi: 10.1111/papr.13165. Epub 2022 Oct 27.

Gabapentin-Friend or foe?

Affiliations
Review

Gabapentin-Friend or foe?

Marc Russo et al. Pain Pract. 2023 Jan.

Abstract

Background: Gabapentin is a recommended first-line agent for treating neuropathic pain; however, its efficacy rate is reportedly low, and the risk of adverse events is high. A plausible explanation for this lies with its wide range of actions, the entirety of which have yet to be fully elucidated.

Methods: A review of the literature was conducted on gabapentin's known and proposed analgesic mechanisms of action, as well as potentially opposing or detrimental actions.

Results: Gabapentin's classical analgesic mechanisms involve direct attenuation of excitatory neurotransmission in the spinal cord via inhibition of neuronal ion channels, while indirect mechanisms include descending inhibition and block of injury-evoked synaptogenesis. Glial effects have also been reported; however, whether they are neuroprotective or detrimental is unknown. Furthermore, data from animal models do not reflect clinical outcomes.

Conclusions: Gabapentin's clinical use should be reconsidered according to the net effects of its numerous assumed actions, including the tripartite synapse and oligodendrocyte effects. Whether it is doing more harm than good, especially in the scenarios of incomplete or loss of response, warrants consideration when prescribing gabapentin.

Keywords: analgesia; gabapentin; glial cells; neuropathic pain; pharmacologic actions.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Mack A. Examination of the evidence for off‐label use of gabapentin. J Manag Care Pharm. 2003;9:559–68. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Peckham AM, Evoy KE, Ochs L, Covvey JR. Gabapentin for off‐label use: evidence‐based or cause for concern? Subst Abuse. 2018;12:1178221818801311. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Goodman CW, Brett AS. A clinical overview of off‐label use of gabapentinoid drugs. JAMA Intern Med. 2019;179:695–701. - PubMed
    1. Evoy KE, Sadrameli S, Contreras J, Covvey JR, Peckham AM, Morrison MD. Abuse and misuse of pregabalin and gabapentin: a systematic review update. Drugs. 2021;81:125–56. - PubMed
    1. Bykov K, Bateman BT, Franklin JM, Vine SM, Patorno E. Association of gabapentinoids with the risk of opioid‐related adverse events in surgical patients in the United States. JAMA Netw Open. 2020;3:e2031647. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms