Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Oct;50(5):352-357.
doi: 10.5152/TJAR.2022.21367.

A Comparison of the Effectiveness of Videolaryngoscopy and Macintosh Laryngoscopy in Intubation Attempts on Adult Patients

Affiliations

A Comparison of the Effectiveness of Videolaryngoscopy and Macintosh Laryngoscopy in Intubation Attempts on Adult Patients

Haydar Bektaş et al. Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim. 2022 Oct.

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of videolaryngoscopy and Macintosh laryngoscopy on adult patients who were scheduled for elective surgery under general anaesthesia.

Methods: Of the 200 adult patients who were scheduled to undergo general anaesthesia, 100 were intubated with a videolaryngoscope and 100 with a Macintosh laryngoscope. The patients' age, sex, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, height, weight, body mass index, smoking and alcohol habits, comorbidity, and neck circumference were recorded. Their El-Ganzouri Risk Index score, which considers the parameters of mouth opening, thyromental distance, Mallampati score, neck movement, propensity for prognathism, body weight, and history of difficult intubation, was also calculated and recorded. The time to achieve intubation was then recorded. The number of intubation attempts, number of cases of difficult intubation, Cormack-Lehane scores, and incidences of trauma or complication were also evaluated.

Results: The mean intubation time was found to be significantly lower in the videolaryngoscope group compared to the Macintosh laryngoscope group. Although the number of patients with difficult intubation was high in the videolaryngoscope group, when we evaluated their glottic view, the Cormack-Lehane score was found to be significantly lower. The number and ratio of complications due to intubation were lower in the videolaryngoscope group compared to the Macintosh laryngoscopy group.

Conclusions: In patients undergoing endotracheal intubation for general anaesthesia, it was concluded that videolaryngoscopy is superior to Macintosh laryngoscopy as it enlarges the glottic view, shortens the time to achieve intubation, facilitates intubation, and has less risk of complications.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Cormack-Lehane scoring information between groups. CL, Cormack-Lehane score; ML, Macintosh laryngoscope; VL, videolarynoscope.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Number of intubation attempts for patients in both groups. ML, Macintosh laryngoscope; VL, videolaryngoscope.

References

    1. Hagberg CA, Artime CA. Airway management in the adult. In: Miller RD.ed. Miller’s Anesthesia. 8th ed. Philadelphia; Elsevier, Saunder; 2015:1647 16 84.
    1. Marrel J, Blanc C, Frascarolo P, Magnusson L. Videolaryngoscopy improves intubation condition in morbidly obese patients. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2007;24(12):1 045 104 9. 10.1017/S0265021507000889) - DOI - PubMed
    1. Apfelbaum JL, Hagberg CA, Caplan RA.et al. Practice guidelines for management of the difficult airway. An updated report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Management of the Difficult Airway. Anesthesiology. 2013;118:251 2 70. - PubMed
    1. Howard-Quijano KJ, Huang YM, Matevosian R, Kaplan MB, Steadman RH. Video assisted instruction improves the success rate for tracheal intubation by novices. Br J Anaesth. 2008;101(4):568 5 72. 10.1093/bja/aen211) - DOI - PubMed
    1. Safavi M, Honarmand A, Dasgerdi EG, Sharifi GM. The correlation between anthropometric indices and hemodynamic changes after laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation. Adv Biomed Res. 2016;5:45. 10.4103/2277-9175.178805) - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources