Online suicidal thoughts and/or behaviours talk: A scoping review protocol
- PMID: 36301893
- PMCID: PMC9612572
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0276776
Online suicidal thoughts and/or behaviours talk: A scoping review protocol
Abstract
The anonymity that the internet and social media affords users means that suicidal thoughts and/or behaviours can be talked about with a sense of freedom and disinhibition that is often not possible in face-to-face contexts. Better understanding online suicidal thoughts and/or behaviour talk is critical as more people turn to online spaces for support. Without this the potentiality of such spaces as sites for suicide prevention and intervention is likely to remain unrealised. Currently there are no scoping or systematic review syntheses focusing on internet and/or on social media suicidal thoughts and/or behaviour talk. This lack of synthesis is problematic as it makes it more difficult for online suicide prevention and intervention practices, policies, and our understanding of suicide to advance in a coherent and evidence-based manner. A scoping review protocol following Arksey and O'Malley's six-step modified framework has been developed to address this synthesis gap. It aims to systematically map the empirical literature that has investigated online suicidal thoughts and/or behaviours talk. It is anticipated that review outcomes could inform the training of health practitioners and peer/professional online moderators in how to best talk with people experiencing suicidal thoughts and/or behaviours. Outcomes could also form an evidence-base for developing policies and practices that focus on online places as safe spaces to talk about suicidal thoughts and/or behaviours. Developers of safe language guidelines could also use the outcomes to audit how well current guidelines reflect empirical evidence. Outcomes could enable researchers to design future online suicidal thoughts and/behaviours talk studies that extend our understandings of suicide leading to potential refinements of contemporary suicide theories/models.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Similar articles
-
Suicidal behaviours and moderator support in online health communities: protocol for a scoping review.BMJ Open. 2020 Jan 20;10(1):e034162. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034162. BMJ Open. 2020. PMID: 31964676 Free PMC article.
-
Exploring Web-Based Support for Suicidal Ideation in the Scottish Population: Usability Study.JMIR Form Res. 2025 Jan 24;9:e55932. doi: 10.2196/55932. JMIR Form Res. 2025. PMID: 39854713 Free PMC article.
-
Suicidal behaviours and moderator support in online health communities: a scoping review.BMJ Open. 2021 Jun 30;11(6):e047905. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047905. BMJ Open. 2021. PMID: 34193497 Free PMC article.
-
Proactive Suicide Prevention Online (PSPO): Machine Identification and Crisis Management for Chinese Social Media Users With Suicidal Thoughts and Behaviors.J Med Internet Res. 2019 May 8;21(5):e11705. doi: 10.2196/11705. J Med Internet Res. 2019. PMID: 31344675 Free PMC article.
-
Living with suicidal thoughts: A scoping review.Scand J Caring Sci. 2023 Mar;37(1):60-78. doi: 10.1111/scs.13137. Epub 2022 Dec 16. Scand J Caring Sci. 2023. PMID: 36527267
References
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous