Adhesions in abdomino-pelvic surgeries: A real economic impact?
- PMID: 36301908
- PMCID: PMC9612443
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0276810
Adhesions in abdomino-pelvic surgeries: A real economic impact?
Abstract
Study objective: To evaluate the epidemiologic and economic burden related to adhesions and their complications for the French healthcare system.
Design: A descriptive and economic retrospective analysis.
Setting: Medicalized information system program (PMSI), national scale of costs.
Patients: Female patients operated on to treat adhesions related complications in 2019.
Interventions: All patients with coded adhesiolysis acts were selected in order to identify the characteristics of Diagnosis related groups (DRG) and compare them with the general DRGs. Then, a sub-analysis on surgery types (laparoscopy or open procedures) was performed to evaluate impact adhesions development and Length of Stay. Lastly, direct costs of adhesions for the healthcare system were quantified based upon adhesiolysis acts coded as main diagnosis.
Measurements and main results: 26.387 adhesiolysis procedures were listed in France in 2019 through 8 adhesiolysis acts regrouping open surgeries and laparoscopic procedures. Adhesiolysis was coded in up to 34% in some DRGs for laparoscopic procedures. 1551 (1461 studied in our study) surgeries have been realized in 2019 with main procedure: adhesiolysis. These surgeries were associated with an expense of €4 million for the healthcare system for rehospitalizations and reoperations only. Social costs such as sick leaves, drugs and other cares haven't been taken in consideration.
Conclusion: Adhesions related complications represent a massive burden for patients and an expensive problem for society. These difficulties may likely to be reduced by a broader use of antiadhesion barriers, at least in some targeted procedures.
Conflict of interest statement
I have read the journal’s policy and the authors of this manuscript have the following competing interests: Baxter company for 2 authors This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials
Figures
Similar articles
-
Laparotomy for small-bowel obstruction: first choice or last resort for adhesiolysis? A laparoscopic approach for small-bowel obstruction reduces 30-day complications.Surg Endosc. 2014 Jan;28(1):65-73. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-3162-6. Epub 2013 Sep 4. Surg Endosc. 2014. PMID: 24002917
-
Adhesion-related readmissions after open and laparoscopic surgery: a retrospective cohort study (SCAR update).Lancet. 2020 Jan 4;395(10217):33-41. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32636-4. Lancet. 2020. PMID: 31908284
-
Reduction of adhesion formation after gynaecological adhesiolysis surgery with 4DryField PH - a retrospective, controlled study with second look laparoscopies.J Obstet Gynaecol. 2022 May;42(4):658-664. doi: 10.1080/01443615.2021.1928030. Epub 2021 Aug 14. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2022. PMID: 34392782
-
Epidemiology and Prevention of Postsurgical Adhesions Revisited.Ann Surg. 2016 Jan;263(1):12-9. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001286. Ann Surg. 2016. PMID: 26135678 Review.
-
Adhesions in patients with chronic pelvic pain: a role for adhesiolysis?Fertil Steril. 2004 Dec;82(6):1483-91. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2004.07.948. Fertil Steril. 2004. PMID: 15589847 Review.
Cited by
-
Effect of focused ultrasound ablation and myomectomy on pelvic adhesions in patients with uterine fibroids.Am J Transl Res. 2023 Dec 15;15(12):6959-6969. eCollection 2023. Am J Transl Res. 2023. PMID: 38187000 Free PMC article.
-
Tissue adhesion after surgical interventions (Review).Exp Ther Med. 2025 Mar 17;29(5):97. doi: 10.3892/etm.2025.12847. eCollection 2025 May. Exp Ther Med. 2025. PMID: 40165802 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Audebert A, Darai E, Benifla JL, et al.. Postoperative abdominal adhesions and their prevention in gynaecological surgery: I. What should you know? Gynecol Obstet Fertil. 2012; 40(6):365–370 - PubMed
-
- Bristow RE, Santillan A, Diaz-Montes TP, Gardner GJ, Giuntoli RL 2nd Peeler ST. Prevention of adhesion formation after radical hysterectomy using a sodium hyaluronate-carboxymethylcellulose (HA-CMC) barrier: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Gynecol Oncol. 2007. Mar;104(3):739–46. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2006.09.029 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Ten Broek RPG, Stommel MWJ, Strik C, Van Laarhoven CJHM, Keus F, Van Goor H. Benefits and harms of adhesion barriers for abdominal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet. 2014; 383: 48–59 - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources