Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Oct 27;17(10):e0276894.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0276894. eCollection 2022.

Medical student wellness assessment beyond anxiety and depression: A scoping review

Kay-Anne Haykal  1 , Lara Pereira  1 , Aidan Power  2 , Karine Fournier  3
Affiliations

Medical student wellness assessment beyond anxiety and depression: A scoping review

Kay-Anne Haykal et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Background: A significant increase in distress and mental health illnesses has been identified in medical students during their training. As a result, medical schools have attempted to understand factors linked to well-being. Wellness questionnaires present a useful approach to identifying students with risk factors for mental health to provide appropriate resources for support and referrals. This study aims to identify validated questionnaires in the literature that measure medical student wellness.

Methods: A scoping review methodology was selected and an exhaustive search of MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, APA PsycInfo, EPIC, and Education Source, was performed from 1999 to May 27, 2021. A compilation of validated wellness evaluation tools, surveys and questionnaires assessing wellness beyond depression and anxiety was reviewed. All validated methods of wellness assessment for medical students were included.

Results: 5,001 studies were identified once duplicate records were removed. After applying inclusion and exclusion criteria, 23 articles were included in a qualitative synthesis and explored in detail. The following six validated questionnaires measuring the wellness of medical school students are reported and discussed: the Medical Student Stress Profile (MSSP), the Medical Student Stress Questionnaire (MSSQ), the Medical Student Well-Being Index (MSWBI), the Perceived Medical School Stress (PMSS), the Perceived Stress Scale for Medical Students (PSSMS), and the Oldenburg Burnout Inventory-Medical Student Version (OLBI-MS). These validated questionnaires provide various aspects to the assessment of wellbeing.

Conclusions: Wellbeing evaluations are reliable in identifying medical students who are at risk for mental health illnesses but must be chosen carefully based on contexts, academic environment and student population. A direct comparison between validated questionnaires for student wellbeing is not possible and individual medical schools must determine the appropriateness and validity of such tools based on population-specific characteristics and demands.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Flow diagram of literature search and selection criteria.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Official records of the World Health Organization: United Nations, Interim Commission; 1976.
    1. Monrad SU, Wolff M, Kurtz J, Deiorio NM, Sabo R, Stringer JK, et al.. What is the association between student well-being and high-stakes examination scores? Medical Education. 2021. doi: 10.1111/medu.14460 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kötter T, Fuchs S, Heise M, Riemenschneider H, Sanftenberg L, Vajda C, et al.. What keeps medical students healthy and well? A systematic review of observational studies on protective factors for health and well-being during medical education. BMC Medical Education. 2019;19(1):94. doi: 10.1186/s12909-019-1532-z - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, Group P. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6(7):e1000097. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. McGowan J SM, Salzwedel DM, Cogo E, Foerster V, Lefebvre C. PRESS Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies: 2015 guideline statement. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2016;75:40–6. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.01.021 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types