Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Case Reports
. 2023 Jan-Feb;44(1):103675.
doi: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2022.103675. Epub 2022 Oct 21.

Concordant palliative care delivery in advanced head and neck cancer

Affiliations
Case Reports

Concordant palliative care delivery in advanced head and neck cancer

Sydney T Cannon et al. Am J Otolaryngol. 2023 Jan-Feb.

Abstract

Objectives: To describe the palliative care consultation practices in an academic head and neck surgery practice.

Methods: This is a retrospective review of a palliative care database and the health record for all palliative care consultations of patients suffering from advanced stage head and neck cancer within a 21-month period.

Results: Ten head and neck cancer patients received palliative care consults while on the otolaryngology service. One consultation occurred preoperatively; nine occurred postoperatively, on a median of hospital day 9. At the time of referral, seven patients were in the ICU and three were on a surgical floor. Code status de-escalation occurred in six patients and psycho-socio-spiritual suffering was supported in all consultations. Nine patients died within six months, with a median post-consultation survival of 35 days. Of these, two died in an ICU, five were discharged to hospice, one to a SNF, and one to a LTACH.

Conclusion: Palliative care consultation in this advanced head and neck cancer cohort was commonly late, however, significant suffering was mitigated following most consults. Palliative care specialists are experts at eliciting patient values, determining acceptable tradeoffs and suffering limitations by employing a shared decision-making process that ends with a patient-centered value-congruent treatment recommendation. Oftentimes, this embraces curative-intent or palliative surgery, along with contingency plans for unacceptable value-incongruent postoperative outcomes. Enhanced awareness of the benefits of embracing concordant palliative care in advanced head and neck cancer patients may help overcome the significant barriers to involving palliative care experts earlier.

Keywords: End-of-life; Palliative care; Shared decision-making; Suffering; Values.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Pictorial timeline of patients’ hospitalization.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Bow-tie model of palliative care.

References

    1. Timon C, Reilly K. Head and neck mucosal squamous cell carcinoma: results of palliative management. J. Laryngol Otol 2006;120(5):389–92. 10.1017/S0022215106000740. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hoesseini A, Offerman MPJ, van de Wall-Neecke BJ, Sewnaik A, Wieringa MH, Baatenburg de Jong RJ. Physicians’ clinical prediction of survival in head and neck cancer patients in the palliative phase. BMC Palliat Care 2020;19(1):176. 10.1186/s12904-020-00682-2. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jones AS. The untreated patient with squamous carcinoma of the head and neck. Am. J. Clin. Oncol 1995;18(4):363–8. 10.1097/00000421-199508000-00018. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ledbetter R, Marterre B. Where’s the value in preoperative covenants between surgeons and patients? AMA J. Ethics 2021;23(10):e814–22. 10.1001/amajethics.2021.814. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bubis LD, Davis L, Mahar A, et al. Symptom burden in the first year after cancer diagnosis: an analysis of patient-reported outcomes. J. Clin. Oncol 2018;36(11): 1103–11. 10.1200/JCO.2017.76.0876. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types