Studies of prevalence: how a basic epidemiology concept has gained recognition in the COVID-19 pandemic
- PMID: 36302576
- PMCID: PMC9620521
- DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061497
Studies of prevalence: how a basic epidemiology concept has gained recognition in the COVID-19 pandemic
Abstract
Background: Prevalence measures the occurrence of any health condition, exposure or other factors related to health. The experience of COVID-19, a new disease caused by SARS-CoV-2, has highlighted the importance of prevalence studies, for which issues of reporting and methodology have traditionally been neglected.
Objective: This communication highlights key issues about risks of bias in the design and conduct of prevalence studies and in reporting them, using examples about SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19.
Summary: The two main domains of bias in prevalence studies are those related to the study population (selection bias) and the condition or risk factor being assessed (information bias). Sources of selection bias should be considered both at the time of the invitation to take part in a study and when assessing who participates and provides valid data (respondents and non-respondents). Information bias appears when there are systematic errors affecting the accuracy and reproducibility of the measurement of the condition or risk factor. Types of information bias include misclassification, observer and recall bias. When reporting prevalence studies, clear descriptions of the target population, study population, study setting and context, and clear definitions of the condition or risk factor and its measurement are essential. Without clear reporting, the risks of bias cannot be assessed properly. Bias in the findings of prevalence studies can, however, impact decision-making and the spread of disease. The concepts discussed here can be applied to the assessment of prevalence for many other conditions.
Conclusions: Efforts to strengthen methodological research and improve assessment of the risk of bias and the quality of reporting of studies of prevalence in all fields of research should continue beyond this pandemic.
Keywords: COVID-19; EPIDEMIOLOGY; STATISTICS & RESEARCH METHODS.
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: None declared.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of four different strategies for SARS-CoV-2 surveillance in the general population (CoV-Surv Study): a structured summary of a study protocol for a cluster-randomised, two-factorial controlled trial.Trials. 2021 Jan 8;22(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04982-z. Trials. 2021. PMID: 33419461 Free PMC article.
-
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12. Early Hum Dev. 2020. PMID: 33036834
-
Prevalence of Gastrointestinal Symptoms and Fecal Viral Shedding in Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jun 1;3(6):e2011335. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.11335. JAMA Netw Open. 2020. PMID: 32525549 Free PMC article.
-
Thoracic imaging tests for the diagnosis of COVID-19.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Sep 30;9:CD013639. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013639.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Nov 26;11:CD013639. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013639.pub3. PMID: 32997361 Updated.
-
COVID-19 Pandemic and Infant Neurodevelopmental Impairment: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Oct 3;5(10):e2238941. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.38941. JAMA Netw Open. 2022. PMID: 36306133 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Tool to assess risk of bias in studies estimating the prevalence of mental health disorders (RoB-PrevMH).BMJ Ment Health. 2023 Oct;26(1):e300694. doi: 10.1136/bmjment-2023-300694. BMJ Ment Health. 2023. PMID: 37899074 Free PMC article.
-
COVID-19 vaccine acceptance in the general population and under-resourced communities from high-income countries: realist review.BMJ Open. 2024 Apr 17;14(4):e084560. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-084560. BMJ Open. 2024. PMID: 38631831 Free PMC article. Review.
-
"Boosting" Surveillance for a More Impactful Public Health Response During Protracted and Evolving Infectious Disease Threats: Insights From the COVID-19 Pandemic.Health Secur. 2023 Sep;21(S1):S47-S55. doi: 10.1089/hs.2023.0046. Epub 2023 Aug 29. Health Secur. 2023. PMID: 37643313 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Characteristics of calcified nodule attributable to culprit lesion in acute coronary syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis.iScience. 2024 Jun 22;27(7):110351. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2024.110351. eCollection 2024 Jul 19. iScience. 2024. PMID: 39092174 Free PMC article.
-
Longitudinal investigation of a single variant SARS-CoV-2-outbreak in the immunologically naïve population of Ulvik, Norway.BMC Infect Dis. 2024 Oct 15;24(1):1161. doi: 10.1186/s12879-024-09856-2. BMC Infect Dis. 2024. PMID: 39407116 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Porta M. A dictionary of epidemiology. 6th Edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014. https://www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/acref/9780199976720.001.000...
-
- Rothman KJ, Greenland S, Lash TL. Measures of Occurrence. In: Rothman KJ, Greenland S, eds. Modern epidemiology. Boston, Massachusetts: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2020: 32–50.
-
- Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME) . The global burden of disease study: University of Washington, 2020. Available: http://www.healthdata.org/gbd/about [Accessed 10 Oct 2022].
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous