Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Oct 11:3:1004056.
doi: 10.3389/falgy.2022.1004056. eCollection 2022.

Manufacturing processes of peanut (Arachis hypogaea) allergen powder-dnfp

Affiliations

Manufacturing processes of peanut (Arachis hypogaea) allergen powder-dnfp

Stephanie A Leonard et al. Front Allergy. .

Abstract

Background: Important components of drug safety, efficacy, and acceptability involve manufacturing and testing of the drug substance and drug product. Peanut flour sourcing/processing and manufacturing processes may affect final drug product allergen potency and contamination level, possibly impacting drug safety, quality, and efficacy. We describe key steps in the manufacturing processes of peanut (Arachis hypogaea) allergen powder-dnfp (PTAH; Palforzia®), a drug used in oral immunotherapy (OIT) for the treatment of peanut allergy.

Methods: Established criteria for source material must be met for manufacturing PTAH drug product. Degree of roasting was determined with a Hunter colorimeter. Protein/allergen content, identity, potency, safety, and quality of each batch of PTAH drug substance were assessed with a combustion analyzer, allergen-specific Western blot (immunoblotting), ELISA, and HPLC. Contaminants (ie, aflatoxin) were measured by UPLC.

Results: Roasting degree beyond "light roast" was associated with variable degrees of protein allergen degradation, or potentially aggregation. Relative potency and amounts of protein allergens showed variability due in part to seasonal/manufacturing variability. Proportion of lots not meeting aflatoxin limits has increased in recent years. Up to 60% of peanut flour source material failed to meet screening selection acceptance criteria for proceeding to drug substance testing, mostly because of failure to meet potency acceptance criteria. Other lots were rejected due to safety (ie, aflatoxin) and quality. Influence of potency variation, within specification parameters, on safety/tolerability observed in trials was considered low, in part due to stringent controls placed at each step of manufacturing.

Conclusions: Extensive variability in allergen potency is a critical issue during immunotherapy, particularly during OIT initial dose escalation and up-dosing, as it may result in lack of efficacy or avoidable adverse allergic reactions. Based on EU and US regulatory requirements, the production of PTAH includes manufacturing controls to ensure drug product safety, potency, and quality. For example, although PTAH contains all peanut allergens, each lot has met strict criteria ensuring consistent allergenic potency of Ara h 1, Ara h 2, and Ara h 6. The rigor of PTAH's manufacturing process ensures reliable dose consistency and stability throughout its shelf life.

Keywords: drug; food; manufacturing; oral immunotherapy; peanut (Arachis hypogaea) allergen powder-dnfp; peanut allergy; standardization.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Stephanie A. Leonard reports being a consultant for Aimmune Therapeutics, a Nestlé Health Science company, DBV Technologies, and Cour Pharmaceuticals Development Co., Inc, a member of the International FPIES Association medical advisory board, a speaker for Aimmune Therapeutics, a Nestlé Health Science company, and a site investigator for Aimmune Therapeutics, a Nestlé Health Science company, and DBV Technologies. Yasushi Ogawa is an employee of Aimmune Therapeutics, a Nestlé Health Science company. Paul T. Jedrzejewski is an employee of Aimmune Therapeutics, a Nestlé Health Science company. Soheila J. Maleki has no disclosures to report. Martin D. Chapman reports an R01 research grant on the structural biology of allergens from NIH NIAID. In addition, they report honorarium for molecular allergology symposium from Johns Hopkins University and is a co-owner and shareholder of InBio. Stephen A. Tilles is an employee of Aimmune Therapeutics, a Nestlé Health Science company. George Du Toit reports research grants to their institution and advisory board fees from Aimmune Therapeutics, a Nestlé Health Science company. S. Shahzad Mustafa reports honoraria for Aimmune program. Brian P. Vickery reports advisory board/consultant for Aimmune Therapeutics, AllerGenis, FARE, Reacta; site investigator for Aimmune Therapeutics, a Nestlé Health Science company, DBV, Genentech, Regeneron; and research grants from FARE and NIAID.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowchart of the manufacturing process for peanut flour source material generation at GPTN. Abbreviation: GPTN, Golden Peanut and Tree Nuts.
Figure 2
Figure 2
PTAH source material selection process. Abbreviations: COA, Certificate of Analysis; ELISA, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; GPTN, Golden Peanut and Tree Nuts; HPLC, high-performance liquid chromatography; PTAH, peanut (Arachis hypogaea) allergen powder-dnfp.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Relative potency ranges for Ara h 1, Ara h 2, and Ara h 6 of selected lots from 2018 to 2021. Whisker plot: The upper and lower whisker bars represent the upper and the lower extreme values. The upper and lower boundaries of the box and the horizontal line represent the upper and lower quartiles and the median. X is the mean. Single data point is an outlier.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Allergens Ara h 2 and Ara h 6 lot peak area percentage ranges by protein integrity from 2018 to 2021 in source material screened lots. Whisker plot: The upper and lower whisker bars represent the upper and the lower extreme values. The upper and lower boundaries of the box and the horizontal line represent the upper and lower quartiles and the median. X is the mean. Ara h 1 is not displayed due to a very small peak area percentage.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Total aflatoxins in commercial peanut flour lots from 2010 to 2020. Peanut flour lots used in PTAH manufacturing are limited to no more than 4 ppb of total aflatoxins, shown by the red dashed line. GPTN would not manufacture peanut flour from peanut crop where the total aflatoxin exceeds 15 ppb. Abbreviations: GPTN, Golden Peanut and Tree Nuts; ppb, parts per billion; PTAH, peanut (Arachis hypogaea) allergen powder-dnfp.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, Center for Veterinary Medicine, Office of Regulatory Affairs. Guidance for industry, quality systems approach to pharmaceutical CGMP regulations (2006). Available at: https://www.fda.gov/media/71023/download (Accessed May 19, 2022).
    1. Bonertz A, Roberts GC, Hoefnagel M, Timon M, Slater JE, Rabin RL, et al. Challenges in the implementation of EAACI guidelines on allergen immunotherapy: a global perspective on the regulation of allergen products. Allergy. (2018) 73(1):64–76. 10.1111/all.13266 - DOI - PubMed
    1. United States Food and Drug Administration, Department of Health and Human Services. CFR - code of federal regulations title 21, 21CFR314.3 (2022). Available at: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfcfr/cfrsearch.cfm?f... (Accessed May 19, 2022).
    1. Kim EH, Burks AW. Food allergy immunotherapy: oral immunotherapy and epicutaneous immunotherapy. Allergy. (2020) 75(6):1337–46. 10.1111/all.14220 - DOI - PubMed
    1. United States Food and Drug Administration, Department of Health and Human Services. CFR - code of federal regulations title 21, 21CFR101.14 (2022). Available at: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfcfr/cfrsearch.cfm?f... (Accessed May 19, 2022).