Mapping Current Organizational Structure and Improvement Points of Breast Cancer Multidisciplinary Team Meetings - An Interview Study
- PMID: 36304726
- PMCID: PMC9596230
- DOI: 10.2147/JMDH.S380293
Mapping Current Organizational Structure and Improvement Points of Breast Cancer Multidisciplinary Team Meetings - An Interview Study
Abstract
Purpose: The aim of the study was to map current organization, and document potential improvement points of breast cancer multidisciplinary team meetings (MDTMs), in order to support the optimization of the present breast cancer MDTM organization.
Methods: From January 2019 to February 2021, 24 core team members of the breast cancer multidisciplinary team (MDT) in three hospitals were interviewed. Semi-structured interviews were performed based on an interview guide. All interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim. Deductive coding was performed on the transcripts by two independent researchers. The codes were organized in categories and themes.
Results: In total 24 healthcare professionals; surgeons, medical oncologists, radiotherapists, pathologists, radiologists, and specialized nurses, from three different hospitals were interviewed. According to the participants, improving efficiency before and during MDTMs is possible by ensuring proper preparation of attendees, implementing more structure during discussions, improving access to and availability of patient data and optimizing general meeting discipline.
Conclusion: Preparation, structure, data availability and meeting discipline were highlighted as essential factors for efficient breast cancer MDTM improvement. These topics seem to be applicable to other types of oncology MDTMs as well. Improving MDTM efficiency on the long term ensures high-quality discussions for all breast cancer patients.
Keywords: MDTM evaluation; breast cancer MDTMs; breast cancer care efficiency; optimizing breast cancer care; qualitative research.
© 2022 Kočo et al.
Conflict of interest statement
Prof. Dr Mathias Prokop reports grants, personal fees from Siemens Healthineers, during the conduct of the study; grants, personal fees from Canon Medical Systems, personal fees from Bracco, outside the submitted work. Dr Ritse M Mann reports grants, personal fees, non-financial support from Siemens, grants, personal fees from Bayer, grants, non-financial support from Screenpoint, grants, personal fees, non-financial support from BD, grants, non-financial support from Koning, grants, non-financial support from PA-Imaging, outside the submitted work. The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Figures


References
-
- Li J, Robertson T, Hansen S, Mansfield T, Kjeldskov J. Multidisciplinary medical team meetings: a field study of collaboration in health care; 2008: 73–80.
-
- Westerhuis W. Kwaliteitscriteria multidisciplinair overleg (EN: Quality criteria for multidisciplinary team meetings). Integraal Kanker Centrum Nederland (National Comprehensive Cancer Organization). https://iknl.nl/nkr/evaluatie-met-nkr-data/multidisciplinair-overleg#:~:.... Accessed July 7, 2021.
-
- Parker S. Clinical guidelines for the management of breast cancer. England: NHS; 2019.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources