Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2022 Nov 15;36(14):1949-1958.
doi: 10.1097/QAD.0000000000003361. Epub 2022 Aug 18.

Low-frequency pre-treatment HIV drug resistance: effects on 2-year outcome of first-line efavirenz-based antiretroviral therapy

Affiliations
Observational Study

Low-frequency pre-treatment HIV drug resistance: effects on 2-year outcome of first-line efavirenz-based antiretroviral therapy

Ross S Milne et al. AIDS. .

Abstract

Objectives: Assess the impact of pre-treatment high-frequency and low-frequency drug-resistant HIV variants on long-term outcomes of first-line efavirenz-based antiretroviral therapy (ART).

Design: Prospective observational study.

Methods: Participants' pre-treatment plasma RNA had two sections of HIV pol encoding reverse transcriptase sequenced (Illumina, MiSeq) using unique molecular identifiers to detect wild-type (pre-treatment drug-resistant variants less than 1% of viral quasispecies), low-frequency (1-9%) or high-frequency drug-resistant variants (10-100%). Associations between pre-treatment drug resistance and virologic outcomes over 24 months of efavirenz-based ART were assessed for the number and frequency of mutations by drug class and other resistance parameters.

Results: Virologic failure was detected in 30 of 352 (9%) and pre-treatment drug-resistant variants were detected in the viral quasispecies of 31 of 352 (9%) participants prescribed efavirenz-based ART. Survival analyses revealed statistically significant associations between pre-treatment drug resistance at low (P < 0.0001) and high (P < 0.001) frequencies, at oligonucleotide ligation assay (OLA) (P < 0.00001) and non-OLA (P < 0.01) codons, to a single-antiretroviral class (P < 0.00001), and a shorter time to virologic failure of efavirenz-based ART. Regression analyses detected independent effects across resistance categories, including both low-frequency (P < 0.01) and high-frequency (P < 0.001) drug-resistant variants.

Conclusion: We observed that pre-treatment HIV drug resistance detected at low frequencies increased the risk of virologic failure over 24 months of efavirenz-based ART, but that most failures, regardless of drug-resistant variants' frequencies, were detected within a year of ART initiation. These observations suggest that when efavirenz-based ART is prescribed, screening for pre-treatment drug resistance by an assay capable of detecting low-frequency variants, including OLA, may guide clinicians to prescribe more effective ART.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest:

No author declared a conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Schema of participant enrollment, drug-resistance genotyping, and virologic outcomes.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Kaplan Meier Survival Analysis of participants with and without pretreatment drug-resistant variants detected by next-generation sequencing.
Panel A: Shorter time to virologic failure was observed among study participants with low-frequency variants alone (P<0.001) or any high-frequency variants (P<0.001), compared to those with wild-type virus. Panel B: Participants with variants at OLA (P<0.001) or non-OLA codons alone (P=0.003) experienced shorter time to virologic failure. Panel C: Shorter time to virologic failure was observed among participants with variants encoding resistance to both a single class (NRTI or NNRTI) alone or dual-drug classes (at least one variant resistant to NRTIs and at least one variant resistant to NNRTIs), although sample size limited testing for statistical significance. Panel D: Shorter time to virologic failure was observed among participants with drug-resistant variants encoding Stanford resistance penalty scores of both less-than-or-equal-to 60 or greater-than 60, but sample size prohibited testing for statistical significance. * = P<0.01; ** = P<0.001

References

    1. Silverman RA, Beck IA, Kiptinness C, et al. Prevalence of Pre-antiretroviral-Treatment Drug Resistance by Gender, Age, and Other Factors in HIV-Infected Individuals Initiating Therapy in Kenya, 2013–2014. J Infect Dis. 2017;216(12):1569–1578. doi:10.1093/infdis/jix544 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gupta RK, Gregson J, Parkin N, et al. HIV-1 drug resistance before initiation or re-initiation of first-line antiretroviral therapy in low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-regression analysis. Lancet Infect Dis. 2018;18(3):346–355. doi:10.1016/S1473-3099(17)30702-8 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Update of Recommendations on First- and Second-Line Antiretroviral Regimens. World Health Organization; 2019.
    1. Kouamou V, Mavetera J, Manasa J, et al. Pretreatment HIV Drug Resistance Among Adults Initiating or Re-Initiating First-Line Antiretroviral Therapy in Zimbabwe: Fast-Tracking the Transition to Dolutegravir-Based First-Line Regimens? AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 2021. Feb 5. doi: 10.1089/AID.2020.0242. Epub ahead of print. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kantor R, Smeaton L, Vardhanabhuti S, et al. Pretreatment HIV Drug Resistance and HIV-1 Subtype C Are Independently Associated With Virologic Failure: Results From the Multinational PEARLS (ACTG A5175) Clinical Trial. Clin Infect Dis Off Publ Infect Dis Soc Am. 2015;60(10):1541–1549. doi:10.1093/cid/civ102 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types