Analysing the effects of metallic biomaterial design and imaging sequences on MRI interpretation challenges due to image artefacts
- PMID: 36306073
- DOI: 10.1007/s13246-022-01183-7
Analysing the effects of metallic biomaterial design and imaging sequences on MRI interpretation challenges due to image artefacts
Abstract
Biometals cause signal loss and susceptibility artefacts in the surrounding tissue, resulting in deterioration in magnetic resonance (MR) images. This metal-artefact effect may lead to interpretation challenges for MR images. Therefore, artefact reduction is required to obtain higher-quality images. This paper aims to analyse the impact of imaging sequence and metallic biomaterial design on MR image artefacts. In this respect, implant specimens were designed in thin, thick, and pointed forms and manufactured using 316LVM, 316L, CoCr-alloy, and Ti-alloy, which are commonly utilized materials in the biomaterials field. Specimens were placed in a phantom that simulates average human anatomy separately and scanned in a 1.5 T MRI under four imaging conditions: "Axial-T1-Gradient-Echo (GRE)", "Sagittal-T1-GRE", "Axial-T2-Spin-Echo (SE)" and "Sagittal-T2-SE". Images were analysed regarding image artefact amount. The lower magnetic susceptibility of Ti-alloy specimens caused 84.76% less deterioration than 316LVM specimens in the MR images with the mean image artefact-to-specimen size ratio. Thinner implant designs provided better performance regarding the metal artefact by reducing the artefact-to-specimen size ratio. T2SE decreased the image artefact by 44.7% for 316LVM and 54.6% for Ti-Alloy specimens and provided better image quality than T1GRE for clinical interpretation. This study reveals that image artefacts directly depend on material content, implant volume, geometry, and imaging sequence selection. The minor artefact effect of T2SE provides more accurate MR images than T1GRE regarding the interpretation of the images of the patients with biometals. The higher magnetic susceptibility of biometals causes more deterioration of the images.
Keywords: Image artefact; Imaging sequence; Magnetic resonance imaging; Magnetic susceptibility; Metallic biomaterials.
© 2022. Australasian College of Physical Scientists and Engineers in Medicine.
Similar articles
-
A standardized evaluation of artefacts from metallic compounds during fast MR imaging.Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2016 Oct;45(8):20160094. doi: 10.1259/dmfr.20160094. Epub 2016 Aug 19. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2016. PMID: 27459058 Free PMC article.
-
Reducing MRI susceptibility artefacts in implants using additively manufactured porous Ti-6Al-4V structures.Acta Biomater. 2020 Apr 15;107:338-348. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2020.02.038. Epub 2020 Feb 28. Acta Biomater. 2020. PMID: 32119921
-
Influence of pulse sequence parameters at 1.5 T and 3.0 T on MRI artefacts produced by metal-ceramic restorations.Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2015;44(8):20150136. doi: 10.1259/dmfr.20150136. Epub 2015 Jun 18. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2015. PMID: 26084475 Free PMC article.
-
BLADE Sequences in Transverse T2-weighted MR Imaging of the Cervical Spine. Cut-off for Artefacts?Rofo. 2015 May;36(2):102-8. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1385179. Epub 2014 Sep 22. Rofo. 2015. PMID: 25912327 Review.
-
Magnetic resonance imaging artefacts caused by orthodontic appliances and/or implant-supported prosthesis: a systematic review.Oral Radiol. 2023 Apr;39(2):394-407. doi: 10.1007/s11282-022-00652-9. Epub 2022 Sep 30. Oral Radiol. 2023. PMID: 36178613
Cited by
-
MRI safety for leave-on powdered hair thickeners under 1.5-T and 3.0-T MRI: measurement of deflection force, MRI artifact, and evaluation of preexamination screening.Phys Eng Sci Med. 2023 Jun;46(2):915-924. doi: 10.1007/s13246-023-01267-y. Epub 2023 May 8. Phys Eng Sci Med. 2023. PMID: 37155115
References
-
- Brown RW, Cheng Y-CN, Haacke EM, Thompson MR, Venkatesan R (2014) Magnetic resonance imaging: physical principles and sequence design. Wiley, Hoboken - DOI
-
- Liang Z-P, Lauterbur PC (2000) Principles of magnetic resonance imaging: a signal processing perspective [Book Review]. Wiley-IEEE Press, New York
-
- Lakshmeeha T, Ajith Kumar KS, Vishanth SC, Kiran SC (2019) Study of correlation between clinical findings, radiological and intra operative findings in lumbar disc prolapse. Int J Orthop Sci 5:65–68. https://doi.org/10.22271/ortho.2019.v5.i3b.1509 - DOI
-
- Nacher PJ, Kumaragamage S, Tastevin G, Bidinosti CP (2020) A fast MOSFET rf switch for low-field NMR and MRI. J Magn Reson. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmr.2019.106638 - DOI
-
- Vinding MS, Skyum B, Sangill R, Lund TE (2019) Ultrafast (milliseconds), multidimensional RF pulse design with deep learning. Magn Reson Med. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.27740 - DOI