Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Oct 28;24(6):113.
doi: 10.1208/s12248-022-00762-6.

Anti-drug Antibody Sample Testing and Reporting Harmonization

Affiliations

Anti-drug Antibody Sample Testing and Reporting Harmonization

Darshana Jani et al. AAPS J. .

Abstract

A clear scientific and operational need exists for harmonized bioanalytical immunogenicity study reporting to facilitate communication of immunogenicity findings and expedient review by industry and health authorities. To address these key bioanalytical reporting gaps and provide a report structure for documenting immunogenicity results, this cross-industry group was formed to establish harmonized recommendations and a develop a submission template to facilitate agency filings. Provided here are recommendations for reporting clinical anti-drug antibody (ADA) assay results using ligand-binding assay technologies. This publication describes the essential bioanalytical report (BAR) elements such as the method, critical reagents and equipment, study samples, results, and data analysis, and provides a template for a suggested structure for the ADA BAR. This publication focuses on the content and presentation of the bioanalytical ADA sample analysis report. The interpretation of immunogenicity data, including the evaluation of the impact of ADA on safety, exposure, and efficacy, is out of scope of this publication.

Keywords: Anti-drug antibodies (ADA); Bioanalytical report (BAR); Clinical Study Report (CSR); Immunogenicity; In-study cut point; Report harmonization; The Integrated Summary of Immunogenicity (ISI).

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

  • Neutralizing Antibody Sample Testing and Report Harmonization.
    Jani D, Gunsior M, Marsden R, Cowan KJ, Irvin SC, Hay LS, Ward B, Armstrong L, Azadeh M, Cao L, Carmean R, DelCarpini J, Dholakiya SL, Hays A, Hosback S, Hu Z, Kulagina N, Kumar S, Lai CH, Lichtfuss M, Liu HY, Liu S, Mozaffari R, Pan L, Pennucci J, Poupart ME, Saini G, Snoeck V, Storey K, Turner A, Vainshtein I, Verthelyi D, Wala I, Yang L, Yang L. Jani D, et al. AAPS J. 2024 Jul 12;26(4):80. doi: 10.1208/s12248-024-00955-1. AAPS J. 2024. PMID: 38992280
  • Neutralizing Antibody Validation Testing and Reporting Harmonization.
    Myler H, Pedras-Vasconcelos J, Lester T, Civoli F, Xu W, Wu B, Vainshtein I, Luo L, Hassanein M, Liu S, Ramaswamy SS, Mora J, Pennucci J, McCush F, Lavelle A, Jani D, Ambakhutwala A, Baltrukonis D, Barker B, Carmean R, Chung S, Dai S, DeWall S, Dholakiya SL, Dodge R, Finco D, Yan H, Hays A, Hu Z, Inzano C, Kamen L, Lai CH, Meyer E, Nelson R, Paudel A, Phillips K, Poupart ME, Qu Q, Abhari MR, Ryding J, Sheldon C, Spriggs F, Warrino D, Wu Y, Yang L, Pasas-Farmer S. Myler H, et al. AAPS J. 2023 Jul 8;25(4):69. doi: 10.1208/s12248-023-00830-5. AAPS J. 2023. PMID: 37421491
  • Anti-drug Antibody Validation Testing and Reporting Harmonization.
    Myler H, Pedras-Vasconcelos J, Phillips K, Hottenstein CS, Chamberlain P, Devanaryan V, Gleason C, Goodman J, Manning MS, Purushothama S, Richards S, Shen H, Zoghbi J, Amaravadi L, Barger T, Bowen S, Bowsher RR, Clements-Egan A, Geng D, Goletz TJ, Gunn GR, Hallett W, Hodsdon ME, Janelsins BM, Jawa V, Kamondi S, Kirshner S, Kramer D, Liang M, Lindley K, Liu S, Liu Z, McNally J, Mikulskis A, Nelson R, Ahbari MR, Qu Q, Ruppel J, Snoeck V, Song A, Yan H, Ware M. Myler H, et al. AAPS J. 2021 Dec 1;24(1):4. doi: 10.1208/s12248-021-00649-y. AAPS J. 2021. PMID: 34853961 Free PMC article.
  • Recommendations for the characterization of immunogenicity response to multiple domain biotherapeutics.
    Gorovits B, Wakshull E, Pillutla R, Xu Y, Manning MS, Goyal J. Gorovits B, et al. J Immunol Methods. 2014 Jun;408:1-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jim.2014.05.010. Epub 2014 May 24. J Immunol Methods. 2014. PMID: 24861938 Review.
  • From the bench to clinical practice: understanding the challenges and uncertainties in immunogenicity testing for biopharmaceuticals.
    Gunn GR 3rd, Sealey DC, Jamali F, Meibohm B, Ghosh S, Shankar G. Gunn GR 3rd, et al. Clin Exp Immunol. 2016 May;184(2):137-46. doi: 10.1111/cei.12742. Epub 2016 Jan 19. Clin Exp Immunol. 2016. PMID: 26597698 Free PMC article. Review.

Cited by

References

    1. Myler H, Pedras-Vasconcelos J, Phillips K, et al. Anti-drug antibody validation testing and reporting harmonization. AAPS J. 2021;24(1):4. https://doi.org/10.1208/s12248-021-00649-y . - DOI - PubMed
    1. EMA. Guideline on immunogenicity assessment of therapeutic proteins. In: (CHMP) CfMPfHU, editor. London. 2017.
    1. Mire-Sluis AR, et al. Recommendations for the design and optimization of immunoassays used in the detection of host antibodies against biotechnology products. J Immunol Methods. 2004;289(1-2):1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jim.2004.06.002 . - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chamberlain P. Effective presentation of immunogenicity risk assessments and related data in regulatory dossiers. Bioanalysis. 2019;11(17):1581–92. https://doi.org/10.4155/bio-2018-0209 . - DOI - PubMed
    1. Immunogenicity testing of therapeutic protein products —developing and validating assays for anti-drug antibody detection, guidance for industry. In: U.S. FDA CfDEaR, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, editor. MD, USA. 2019.

LinkOut - more resources