Sex roles and sex ratios in animals
- PMID: 36307924
- DOI: 10.1111/brv.12915
Sex roles and sex ratios in animals
Abstract
In species with separate sexes, females and males often differ in their morphology, physiology and behaviour. Such sex-specific traits are functionally linked to variation in reproductive competition, mate choice and parental care, which have all been linked to sex roles. At the 150th anniversary of Darwin's theory on sexual selection, the question of why patterns of sex roles vary within and across species remains a key topic in behavioural and evolutionary ecology. New theoretical, experimental and comparative evidence suggests that variation in the adult sex ratio (ASR) is a key driver of variation in sex roles. Here, we first define and discuss the historical emergence of the sex role concept, including recent criticisms and rebuttals. Second, we review the various sex ratios with a focus on ASR, and explore its theoretical links to sex roles. Third, we explore the causes, and especially the consequences, of biased ASRs, focusing on the results of correlational and experimental studies of the effect of ASR variation on mate choice, sexual conflict, parental care and mating systems, social behaviour, hormone physiology and fitness. We present evidence that animals in diverse societies are sensitive to variation in local ASR, even on short timescales, and propose explanations for conflicting results. We conclude with an overview of open questions in this field integrating demography, life history and behaviour.
Keywords: demography; mate choice; parental care; physiology; sex ratios; sex roles; sexual selection.
© 2022 The Authors. Biological Reviews published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Cambridge Philosophical Society.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Ah-King, M. (2012). On anisogamy and the evolution of “sex roles”. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 28, 1-2.
-
- Ah-King, M. & Ahnesjö, I. (2013). The “sex role” concept: an overview and evaluation. Evolutionary Biology 40, 461-470.
-
- Ah-King, M. & Gowaty, P. A. (2016). A conceptual review of mate choice: stochastic demography, within-sex phenotypic plasticity, and individual flexibility. Ecology and Evolution 6, 4607-4642.
-
- Ahnesjö, I., Forsgren, E. & Kvarnemo, C. (2008). Variation in sexual selection. In Fish Behaviour (eds C. Magnhagen, V. A. Braithwaite, E. Forsgren and B. G. Kapoor), pp. 303-335. Science Publishers Inc., Enfield.
-
- Aleuy, O. A., Serrano, E., Ruckstuhl, K. E., Hoberg, E. P. & Kutz, S. (2020). Parasite intensity drives fetal development and sex allocation in a wild ungulate. Scientific Reports 10, 15626.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources