Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Nov;70(11):3785-3790.
doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_1627_22.

Postoperative astigmatic considerations in manual small-incision cataract surgery - A review

Affiliations
Review

Postoperative astigmatic considerations in manual small-incision cataract surgery - A review

Sabyasachi Pattanayak et al. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2022 Nov.

Abstract

Cataract remains a major cause of visual impairment worldwide including in India. The sutureless manual small-incision cataract surgery (MSICS) as an alternative to phacoemulsification, gives equivalent visual results at lower expenses. Still the procedure is often discredited for higher astigmatism due to the larger size of the incision. High astigmatism is an important cause of poor uncorrected visual acuity after cataract surgery. However, there are enough studies in the literature to prove that surgically induced astigmatism (SIA) can be minimized and also eliminated by adopting appropriate wound construction techniques during surgery. Even pre-existing astigmatism if any can be neutralized by changing wound architecture during surgery. Here, we review the various techniques of scleral tunnel construction described in the literature to care for postoperative astigmatism in MSICS.

Keywords: Astigmatism; cataract; manual small-incision cataract surgery.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Astigmatism in SICS according to the location of the incision
Figure 2
Figure 2
Site of incision based on preoperative astigmatism
Figure 3
Figure 3
Shape of incision in manual SICS
Figure 4
Figure 4
Size of incision and astigmatism in SICS
Figure 5
Figure 5
Width of sclerocorneal section

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Venkatesh R, Chang DF, Muralikrishnan R, Hemal K, Gogate P, Sengupta S. Manual small incision cataract surgery:A review. Asia-Pac J Ophthalmol. 2012;1:113–9. - PubMed
    1. Ruit S, Tabin G, Chang D, Bajracharya L, Kline DC, Richheimer W, et al. A prospective randomized clinical trial of phacoemulsification vs manual sutureless small-incision extracapsular cataract surgery in Nepal. Am J Ophthalmol. 2007;143:32–8.e2. - PubMed
    1. Pershing S, Kumar A. Phacoemulsification versus extracapsular cataract extraction:Where do we stand? Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2011;22:37–42. - PubMed
    1. Venkatesh R, Tan CSH, Sengupta S, Ravindran RD, Krishnan KT, Chang DF. Phacoemulsification versus manual small-incision cataract surgery for white cataract. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2010;36:1849–54. - PubMed
    1. Gogate P, Deshpande M, Nirmalan PK. Why do phacoemulsification?Manual small-incision cataract surgery is almost as effective, but less expensive. Ophthalmology. 2007;114:965–8. - PubMed

MeSH terms