Diagnostic accuracy of saliva as a specimen for detection of SARS-CoV-2 by RT-PCR
- PMID: 36308204
- DOI: 10.4103/ijpm.ijpm_292_21
Diagnostic accuracy of saliva as a specimen for detection of SARS-CoV-2 by RT-PCR
Abstract
Context: COVID-19 caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) is an emerging pandemic that is rapidly spreading with more than 114 million confirmed cases and 2.5 million deaths by far. Nasopharyngeal swab (NPS) in VTM has been used as the gold standard respiratory specimen for SARS-CoV-2 reverse-transcriptase real-time PCR (rRT-PCR) tests. But now the virus can also be detected in other clinical specimens like bronchoalveolar lavage, sputum, saliva, throat swab, blood, and stool specimens.
Aims: The aim of this study was to determine the diagnostic potential of saliva as a sample in comparison to NPS for detection of SARS-CoV-2 by rRT-PCR.
Settings and design: A cross-sectional study was conducted among 256 paired samples (NPS and Saliva) received in the Department of Microbiology, SMS Medical College, Jaipur over a period of 2 months.
Methods and material: NPS from individuals were collected in a sterile tube containing Viral Transport Medium™. Before swab collection, whole saliva was collected by spitting from the suspected patient into a sterile container. Both were stored at room temperature and transferred to the diagnostic laboratory within four hours of collection where extraction was done using Perkin Elmer chemagic extractor and rRT- PCR was performed using NIV, Pune mastermix.
Results: Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of RT-PCR for the diagnosis of COVID-19 in saliva were 84.26%, 100%, 100%, and 54.05%, respectively. The accuracy of detection of COVID-19 by saliva samples compared to the routinely used NPS samples (considered as the standard reference) for RT PCR was 86.72%.
Conclusions: Our results show that saliva as a reliable sample type for SARS-CoV-2 detection.
Keywords: Nasopharyngeal swab; SARS-CoV-2; rRT-PCR; saliva.
Similar articles
-
Diagnostic Performance of Self-Collected Saliva Versus Nasopharyngeal Swab for the Molecular Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in the Clinical Setting.Microbiol Spectr. 2021 Dec 22;9(3):e0046821. doi: 10.1128/Spectrum.00468-21. Epub 2021 Nov 3. Microbiol Spectr. 2021. PMID: 34730436 Free PMC article.
-
Saliva specimens for detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 in Kuwait: A cross-sectional study.J Clin Virol. 2020 Nov;132:104652. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2020.104652. Epub 2020 Oct 1. J Clin Virol. 2020. PMID: 33053493 Free PMC article.
-
Diagnostic Performance and Tolerability of Saliva and Nasopharyngeal Swab Specimens in the Detection of SARS-CoV-2 by RT-PCR.Microbiol Spectr. 2023 Jun 15;11(3):e0532422. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.05324-22. Epub 2023 Apr 24. Microbiol Spectr. 2023. PMID: 37093085 Free PMC article.
-
Detection profile of SARS-CoV-2 using RT-PCR in different types of clinical specimens: A systematic review and meta-analysis.J Med Virol. 2021 Feb;93(2):719-725. doi: 10.1002/jmv.26349. Epub 2020 Aug 2. J Med Virol. 2021. PMID: 32706393 Free PMC article.
-
SARS-CoV-2 saliva testing using RT-PCR: a systematic review.Int J Infect Dis. 2022 Aug;121:166-171. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2022.05.008. Epub 2022 May 13. Int J Infect Dis. 2022. PMID: 35577250 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous