Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2022 Oct-Dec;29(4):310-316.
doi: 10.4103/npmj.npmj_189_22.

Evaluation of the effect of nutritive versus non-nutritive pacifiers as adjuncts to local anaesthesia in male neonatal circumcision using the plastibell technique - A prospective randomised controlled study

Chibuike George Ihediwa  1 , Christopher O Bode  2 , Felix M Alakaloko  1 , Olumide A Elebute  2 , Justina O Seyi-Olajide  1 , Oluwaseun Abiola Ladipo-Ajayi  1 , Adesoji O Ademuyiwa  2
Affiliations
Free article
Randomized Controlled Trial

Evaluation of the effect of nutritive versus non-nutritive pacifiers as adjuncts to local anaesthesia in male neonatal circumcision using the plastibell technique - A prospective randomised controlled study

Chibuike George Ihediwa et al. Niger Postgrad Med J. 2022 Oct-Dec.
Free article

Abstract

Background: Male circumcision is the most common surgical procedure worldwide and is often carried out for religious, cultural, medical and public health reasons. It is commonly performed during the neonatal period. Many studies have now shown that pain is a common intra- and post-operative complication. To ensure proper analgesia during the procedure, many surgeons opt for the use of pacifiers as an adjunct to anaesthesia during neonatal circumcision. The aim of this study is to compare nutritive pacifiers (NPs) versus non-NPs (NNPs) as adjuncts to local anaesthesia in male neonatal circumcision using the Plastibell technique.

Methods: A prospective randomised controlled study was carried out between October 2019 and March 2020. A total of 100 neonates were circumcised using the Plastibell technique and randomised into NP (Group A, n = 33), NNP (Group B, n = 33) and controls (Group C, n = 34), respectively. The differences in pain scores using the Neonatal Infant Pain Scale, total crying time and heart rate during circumcision were recorded and assessed.

Results: The age of participants ranged from 5 to 28 days and the weight ranged from 2.5 to 5.0 kg. The overall mean age, birth weight and current weight of the participants were 15.5 ± 6.1 days, 3.4 ± 0.4 kg and 3.5 ± 0.6 kg, respectively. The control group had the highest average pain score of 5.5 (4.5-5.8) compared to the intervention groups with median pain score (NP: 3.3 [1.3-4.3] and (NNP: 4.3 [3.1-5.1], respectively). NPs had significantly lower pain scores (P = 0.023) and reduced total crying time (P = 0.019) at all stages of the circumcision compared to those given NNPs and controls.

Conclusion: This study showed that NPs were superior to NNPs in providing additional pain control during male neonatal circumcision.

Keywords: Anaesthesia; circumcision; nutritive; pacifiers; pain; randomised controlled trial.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None

Publication types