Quantification of Needle Angles for Traditional Lumbar Medial Branch Radiofrequency Ablation: An Osteological Study
- PMID: 36308462
- DOI: 10.1093/pm/pnac160
Quantification of Needle Angles for Traditional Lumbar Medial Branch Radiofrequency Ablation: An Osteological Study
Abstract
Background: Clinical outcomes following lumbar medial branch radiofrequency ablation (RFA) have been inconsistent. One possible reason is less-than-optimal placement of the electrode along the medial branch at the lateral neck of superior articular process (SAP). Needle angles that define optimal placement (i.e., parallel to the medial branch) may be helpful for consistent technical performance of RFA. Despite its importance, there is a lack of anatomical studies that quantify RFA needle placement angles.
Objective: To quantify and compare needle angles to achieve parallel placement along the medial branch as it courses on the middle two-quarters of the lateral neck of the SAP at the L1-L5 vertebrae.
Design: Osteological Study.
Methods: Ten lumbar vertebral columns were used in this study. Needles were placed along the periosteum of the middle two-quarters of the lateral neck of SAP. Mean needle angles for L1-L5 were quantified and compared using posterior (n = 100) and lateral (n = 100) photographs.
Results: Mean needle angles varied ranging from 29.29 ± 17.82° to 47.22 ± 16.27° lateral to the parasagittal plane (posterior view) and 33.53 ± 10.23° to 49.19 ± 10.69° caudal to the superior vertebral endplate (lateral view). Significant differences in mean angles were found between: L1/L3 (P = .008), L1/L4 (P = .003), and L1/L5 (P = .040) in the posterior view and L1/L3 (P = .042), L1/L4 (P < .001), L1/L5 (P < .001), L2/L4 (P = .004), and L2/L5 (P = .004) in lateral view.
Conclusions: Variability of needle angles suggest a standard "one-size-fits-all" approach may not be the optimal technique. Future research is necessary to determine optimal patient-specific needle angles from a more detailed and granular analysis of fluoroscopic landmarks.
Keywords: Denervation; Lumbar Medial Branch; Needle Angles; Osteology.
© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Academy of Pain Medicine. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.
Comment in
-
Reply to Letter to the Editor regarding "Quantification of needle angles for traditional lumbar medial branch radiofrequency ablation: an osteological study".Pain Med. 2023 Sep 1;24(9):1126. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnad053. Pain Med. 2023. PMID: 37144956 No abstract available.
-
Letter to the Editor regarding "Quantification of needle angles for traditional lumbar medial branch radiofrequency ablation: an osteological study".Pain Med. 2023 Sep 1;24(9):1124-1125. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnad054. Pain Med. 2023. PMID: 37144965 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Optimal caudal needle angulation for lumbar medial branch denervation: A 3D cadaveric and clinical imaging comparison study.Interv Pain Med. 2024 Aug 19;3(3):100433. doi: 10.1016/j.inpm.2024.100433. eCollection 2024 Sep. Interv Pain Med. 2024. PMID: 39502907 Free PMC article.
-
Quantification of needle angles for lumbar medial branch denervation targeting the posterior half of the superior articular process: an osteological study.Pain Med. 2024 Jan 4;25(1):13-19. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnad105. Pain Med. 2024. PMID: 37578435
-
Two-Needle Technique for Lumbar Radiofrequency Medial Branch Denervation: A Technical Note.Pain Physician. 2020 Sep;23(5):E507-E516. Pain Physician. 2020. PMID: 32967401
-
Mitigating Factors in L4 and L5 Medial Branch Motor Stimulation During Radiofrequency Ablation.Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2024 Jun;28(6):465-467. doi: 10.1007/s11916-024-01232-8. Epub 2024 Mar 21. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2024. PMID: 38512601 Review.
-
Relationship of dorsal root ganglion to intervertebral foramen in lumbar region: an anatomical study and review of literature.J Neurosurg Sci. 2016 Sep;60(3):339-44. J Neurosurg Sci. 2016. PMID: 27402404 Review.
Cited by
-
3D nerve proximity mapping of the medial branch of lumbar dorsal ramus: An anatomical study.Interv Pain Med. 2024 May 15;3(2):100414. doi: 10.1016/j.inpm.2024.100414. eCollection 2024 Jun. Interv Pain Med. 2024. PMID: 39238583 Free PMC article.
-
A retrospective single arm cohort study evaluating the efficacy of lumbar medial branch radiofrequency ablation using a multi-tined probe and perpendicular approach.Interv Pain Med. 2025 Mar 29;4(2):100575. doi: 10.1016/j.inpm.2025.100575. eCollection 2025 Jun. Interv Pain Med. 2025. PMID: 40230588 Free PMC article.
-
High-fidelity 3D modelling of the lumbar dorsal rami.Interv Pain Med. 2024 Mar 7;3(1):100401. doi: 10.1016/j.inpm.2024.100401. eCollection 2024 Mar. Interv Pain Med. 2024. PMID: 39239499 Free PMC article.
-
Optimal caudal needle angulation for lumbar medial branch denervation: A 3D cadaveric and clinical imaging comparison study.Interv Pain Med. 2024 Aug 19;3(3):100433. doi: 10.1016/j.inpm.2024.100433. eCollection 2024 Sep. Interv Pain Med. 2024. PMID: 39502907 Free PMC article.
-
Letter to editor regarding "Characterizing an angle of cannula insertion for lumbar medial branch radiofrequency neurotomy: A retrospective observational study".Interv Pain Med. 2023 Mar 6;2(1):100238. doi: 10.1016/j.inpm.2023.100238. eCollection 2023 Mar. Interv Pain Med. 2023. PMID: 39239602 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous