Measures to reduce corporate GHG emissions: A review-based taxonomy and survey-based cluster analysis of their application and perceived effectiveness
- PMID: 36308962
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116437
Measures to reduce corporate GHG emissions: A review-based taxonomy and survey-based cluster analysis of their application and perceived effectiveness
Abstract
Companies contribute to a large extent to greenhouse gas emission. To mitigate this, measures for reducing these emissions can be applied. There is, however, neither a systematized general overview of existing measures nor an estimation of their application and their effectiveness to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. This study strives to close this gap by reviewing research on the reduction of corporate greenhouse gas emissions and synthesizing emission reduction measures in a taxonomy. Furthermore, the application of these measures and their perceived effectiveness is empirically assessed using a survey among companies that are involved in emission reduction activities. On this basis, a cluster analysis is conducted to identify measure types and to unveil application patterns. 27 different measures and 65 respective implementation examples are identified and structured within nine categories: energy, product, process, technology, 6R and waste management, office and mobility, management, reporting and disclosure, and compensation measures. The empirical analysis shows that there exist measures with a high efficiency to reduce emission, which are rarely applied in companies. On the other side, a large share of applied measures is not perceived as highly effective. Companies can use these results to structure their emission reduction activities and identify best practices.
Keywords: Carbon footprint reduction; Climate change mitigation; Corporate greenhouse gas emissions; Emission reduction measures; Literature review; Sustainability.
Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Similar articles
-
Mitigation of global greenhouse gas emissions from waste: conclusions and strategies from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Fourth Assessment Report. Working Group III (Mitigation).Waste Manag Res. 2008 Feb;26(1):11-32. doi: 10.1177/0734242X07088433. Waste Manag Res. 2008. PMID: 18338699 Review.
-
Action plan for the mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions in the hospital-based health care of the Hellenic Army.Environ Monit Assess. 2022 Feb 24;194(3):221. doi: 10.1007/s10661-022-09871-3. Environ Monit Assess. 2022. PMID: 35211813
-
Quantifying the effects of general waste reduction on greenhouse-gas emissions at public facilities.J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2019 Oct;69(10):1247-1257. doi: 10.1080/10962247.2019.1642967. Epub 2019 Aug 20. J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2019. PMID: 31429673
-
Greenhouse gas emissions and mitigation potential of hybrid maize seed production in northwestern China.Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Mar;29(12):17787-17798. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-16990-w. Epub 2021 Oct 21. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022. PMID: 34671908
-
Greenhouse gas emissions reduction in different economic sectors: Mitigation measures, health co-benefits, knowledge gaps, and policy implications.Environ Pollut. 2018 Sep;240:683-698. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2018.05.011. Epub 2018 May 26. Environ Pollut. 2018. PMID: 29775945 Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous