Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Dec;31(12):106845.
doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2022.106845. Epub 2022 Oct 26.

Evidence-based interconversion of the Glasgow Outcome and modified Rankin scales: pitfalls and best practices

Affiliations

Evidence-based interconversion of the Glasgow Outcome and modified Rankin scales: pitfalls and best practices

Ben Gaastra et al. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2022 Dec.

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to provide the evidence base to guide interconversion of the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) and Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) in neurological research.

Methods: A retrospective analysis of paired mRS and GOS recordings was conducted using datasets with the following selection criteria: (1) patients had haemorrhagic stroke, (2) simultaneous mRS and GOS measurements were available, and (3) data sharing was possible. The relationship between mRS and GOS was assessed using correlation analysis. The optimum dichotomisation thresholds for agreement between the mRS and GOS were identified using Cohen's kappa coefficient. Two-way conversion tables between mRS and GOS were developed based on the highest agreement between scores. Finally, to identify which direction of conversion (mRS to GOS or vice versa) was better, the Kolmogorov-Smirnov D statistic was calculated.

Results: Using 3474 paired recordings the mRS and GOS were shown to be highly correlated (ρ = 0.90, p < 0.0001). The greatest agreement between the two scoring systems occurred when mRS=0-2 and GOS=4-5 was used to define good outcome (κ=0.83, 95% confidence interval: 0.81-0.85). Converting from mRS to GOS was better than the reverse direction as evidenced by a lower Kolmogorov-Smirnov statistic (D=0.054 compared to D=0.157).

Conclusions: This study demonstrates that the mRS and GOS are highly correlated, establishes the optimum dichotomisation threshold for agreement, provides a method for interconversion and shows that mRS to GOS conversion is superior to the reverse direction if a choice is available.

Keywords: Glasgow outcome scale; Modified Rankin scale; Outcome; Stroke.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations of Competing Interest None.

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
The modified Rankin Scale (mRS) and Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS).
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Empirical cumulative distribution functions comparing A: mRS directly acquired from patients and GOS converted to mRS; and B: GOS directly acquired from patients and mRS converted to GOS. The arrows signify the maximum vertical distance between the two empirical distribution functions with a smaller value representing more similar data distributions (Kolmogorov-Smirnov statistic (D)).

References

    1. Rankin J Cerebral vascular accidents in patients over the age of 60. II. Prognosis. Scott Med J 1957;2(5):200–215. - PubMed
    1. Farrell B, Godwin J, Richards S, Warlow C. The United Kingdom transient ischaemic attack (UK-TIA) aspirin trial: final results. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1991;54(12):1044–1054. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jennett B, Bond M. Assessment of outcome after severe brain damage. Lancet 1975;1(7905):480–484. - PubMed
    1. Tilley BC, Marler J, Geller NL, Lu M, Legler J, Brott T, et al. Use of a global test for multiple outcomes in stroke trials with application to the national institute of neurological disorders and Stroke t-PA stroke trial. Stroke. 1996;27(11):2136–2142. - PubMed
    1. Gaastra B, Ren D, Alexander S, Bennett ER, Bielawski DM, Blackburn SL, et al. Haptoglobin genotype and aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: individual patient data analysis. Neurology 2019;92(18):e2150–e2e64. - PMC - PubMed