Two-drug regimens for HIV treatment
- PMID: 36309038
- PMCID: PMC10015554
- DOI: 10.1016/S2352-3018(22)00249-1
Two-drug regimens for HIV treatment
Abstract
Combination therapy with three antiretroviral agents has been integral to successful HIV-1 treatment since 1996. Although the efficacy, adverse effects, and toxicities of contemporary three-drug regimens have improved, even the newest therapies have potential adverse effects. The use of two-drug regimens is one way to reduce lifetime exposure to antiretroviral drugs while maintaining the benefits of viral suppression. Multiple large, randomised trials have shown the virological non-inferiority of certain two-drug regimens versus three-drug comparators, including adverse effect differences that reflect known profiles of the antiretroviral drugs in the respective regimens. Two-drug combinations are now recommended in treatment guidelines and include the first long-acting antiretroviral regimen for the treatment of HIV-1. Recommended two-drug regimens differ in their risks for, and factors associated with, virological failure and emergent resistance. The tolerability, safety, metabolic profiles, and drug interactions of two-drug regimens also vary by the constituent drugs. No current two-drug regimen is recommended for people with chronic hepatitis B virus as none include tenofovir. Two-drug regimens have increased options for individualised care.
Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of interests SGK has served on advisory boards for Gilead, ViiV, and Theratechnologies. JRA has received advisory fees, speaker fees, and grant support from ViiV, Janssen, Gilead, Merck, Aelix, and Thera. PC has worked on advisory boards at ViiV and Merck and received research and speaker funds from ViiV, CanSino, and Janssen and has received honoraria as a data safety and monitoring board member for Moderna. CO has received payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from Gilead, ViiV, Janssen, GlaxoSmithKline, AstraZeneca, and Merck. ESD has received research support from and is a consultant for Gilead, Merck, GlaxoSmithKline, and ViiV. PES receives research support from Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, and ViiV. He serves as a scientific advisory board member and consultant for Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, ViiV, Merck, and Janssen; and has editorial positions with UpToDate, Medscape, New England Journal of Medicine Journal Watch, and Open Forum Infectious Diseases. BOT has served as a consultant and received honoraria from GlaxoSmithKline, ViiV, Gilead, Merck, and Johnson & Johnson. KMG received a training grant from the Agency For Health Care Research and Quality (T32HS026122).
Figures

Comment in
-
Need for clear inclusion criteria in reviews of antiretroviral treatments.Lancet HIV. 2023 Mar;10(3):e150. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3018(23)00007-3. Epub 2023 Feb 8. Lancet HIV. 2023. PMID: 36773625 No abstract available.
-
Need for clear inclusion criteria in reviews of antiretroviral treatments - Authors' reply.Lancet HIV. 2023 Mar;10(3):e150-e151. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3018(23)00006-1. Epub 2023 Feb 8. Lancet HIV. 2023. PMID: 36773626 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
-
- Moreno S, Perno CF, Mallon PW, et al. Two-drug vs. three-drug combinations for HIV-1: do we have enough data to make the switch? HIV Med 2019; 20 (suppl 4): 2–12. - PubMed
-
- Colasanti J, Marconi VC, Taiwo B. Antiretroviral reduction: is it time to rethink the unthinkable? AIDS 2014; 28: 943–47. - PubMed
-
- Work Group for HIV and Aging Consensus Project. Summary report from the Human Immunodeficiency Virus and Aging Consensus Project: treatment strategies for clinicians managing older individuals with the human immunodeficiency virus. J Am Geriatr Soc 2012; 60: 974–79. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical