Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2023 Feb;17(1):237-248.
doi: 10.1007/s12072-022-10431-7. Epub 2022 Oct 30.

Prediction and evaluation of high-risk patients with primary biliary cholangitis receiving ursodeoxycholic acid therapy: an early criterion

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Prediction and evaluation of high-risk patients with primary biliary cholangitis receiving ursodeoxycholic acid therapy: an early criterion

Chunmei Yang et al. Hepatol Int. 2023 Feb.

Abstract

Background and aims: Current treatment guidelines recommend ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) as the first-line treatment for new-diagnosed primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) patients. However, up to 40% patients are insensitive to UDCA monotherapy, and evaluation of UDCA response at 12 months may result in long period of ineffective treatment. We aimed to develop a new criterion to reliably identify non-response patients much earlier.

Methods: Five hundred sixty-nine patients with an average of 59 months (Median: 53; IQR:32-79) follow-up periods were randomly divided into either the training (70%) or the validation cohort (30%). The efficiency of different combinations of total bilirubin (TBIL), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) threshold values to predict outcomes was assessed at 1, 3 or 6 month after the initiation of UDCA therapy. The endpoints were defined as adverse outcomes, including liver-related death, liver transplantation and complications of cirrhosis. Adverse outcome-free survival was compared using various published criteria and a proposed new criterion.

Results: A new criterion of evaluating UDCA responses at 1 month was established as: ALP ≤ 2.5 × upper limit of normal (ULN) and AST ≤ 2 × ULN, and TBIL ≤ 1 × ULN (Xi'an criterion). The 5 year adverse outcome-free survival rate of UDCA responders, defined by Xi'an criterion, was 97%, which was significantly higher than that of those non-responders (64%). An accurate distinguishing high-risk patients' capacity of Xi'an criterion was confirmed in both early and late-stage PBC.

Conclusions: Xi'an criterion has a similar or even higher ability to distinguish high-risk PBC patients than other published criteria. Xi'an criterion can facilitate early identification of patients requiring new therapeutic approaches.

Keywords: Adverse outcome; Autoimmune liver disease; Biochemical response; Complication; Early prediction; Primary biliary cholangitis; Prognosis; Retrospective cohort study; Stratified therapy; Therapeutics.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Chunmei Yang, Guanya Guo, Bo Li, Linhua Zheng, Ruiqing Sun, Xiufang Wang, Juan Deng, Gui Jia, Xia Zhou, Lina Cui, Changcun Guo, Xinmin Zhou, Patrick S. C. Leung, M. Eric Gershwin, Yulong Shang and Ying Han declared that there are no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flow chart of study design
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
The dynamic change of the levels of ALP, GGT (a), AST, ALT (b), ALB, RBC (c), TBIL (d), TBA (e) and IgM/G (f) within 1 year in PBC patients. Data are expressed as mean ± SD. *p < .001 versus baseline. #p < 0.05 versus baseline
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Time-dependent AUROC values of the Xi’an and other published criteria in entire cohort (a), training cohort (b) and validation cohort (c). AUROC area under receiver operating characteristic curve
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Biochemical response according different criteria in patients with adverse outcomes over time in training cohort (a) and validation cohort (b). PBC patients with an endpoints within 2 years (left), 2–5 years (median), and over 5 years after diagnosis (right)

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. European Association for the Study of the L EASL clinical practice guidelines: management of cholestatic liver diseases. J Hepatol. 2009;51:237–267. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2009.04.009. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Younossi ZM, Bernstein D, Shiffman ML, et al. Diagnosis and management of primary biliary cholangitis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2019;114:48–63. doi: 10.1038/s41395-018-0390-3. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gulamhusein AF, Hirschfield GM. Primary biliary cholangitis: pathogenesis and therapeutic opportunities. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020;17:93–110. doi: 10.1038/s41575-019-0226-7. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Alvaro D, Carpino G, Craxi A, et al. Primary biliary cholangitis management: controversies, perspectives and daily practice implications from an expert panel. Liver Int. 2020;40:2590–2601. doi: 10.1111/liv.14627. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Eksteen B. Predicting risk in primary biliary cholangitis. Hepatology. 2016;63:697–699. doi: 10.1002/hep.28377. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances