Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Oct 14:10:978094.
doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.978094. eCollection 2022.

Influence of job environment on the online teaching anxiety of college teachers in the online teaching context: The mediating role of subjective well-being

Affiliations

Influence of job environment on the online teaching anxiety of college teachers in the online teaching context: The mediating role of subjective well-being

Xu Zhang et al. Front Public Health. .

Abstract

Background: Online education has been conducted widely in higher education in recent years. While online teaching brings many opportunities, it also poses numerous challenges and issues. This is especially true for college teachers, for whom teaching is considered to be a profession with a high level of burnout and anxiety. The large-scale application of online teaching methods has put teachers in an even more challenging context, which may lead to teaching anxiety affecting their mental health. In online teaching contexts, the question of what factors affect college teachers' online teaching anxiety is worth exploring to help reduce their online teaching anxiety so as to promote their work performance. In this study, therefore, we conducted a survey of college teachers to develop a model of job environment (job demands and job resources), subjective well-being, and online teaching anxiety, and to explore the influences of job environment and subjective well-being on their online teaching anxiety, as well as the mediating effects of subjective well-being between job environments and online teaching anxiety.

Method: Of the 1,060 college teachers who participated, 524 were male (49.4%) and 536 were female (50.6%). An online questionnaire was sent to the teachers in January, 2022. Online teaching anxiety, subjective well-being, and job environment scales were adapted and developed. Descriptive analysis, reliability and validity analysis, and structural equation modelling were used to analyse the collected data.

Results: The study model showed an adequate fit (χ2 = 440.983, RMSEA = 0.070, GFI = 0.942, AGFI = 0.914, NFI = 0.949, and CFI = 0.956), confirming the relationships of job demands and online teaching anxiety (β = 0.310, p < 0.001), job resources and online teaching anxiety (β = - 0.086, p < 0.01), job demands and subjective well-being (β = - 0.411, p < 0.001), job resources and subjective well-being (β = 0.204, p < 0.001), and subjective well-being and online teaching anxiety (β = - 0.435, p < 0.001). Meanwhile, the results also proved the effects of the mediating role of subjective well-being between job demands (95% CI = [- 0.138, - 0.225]), job resources (95% CI = [- 0.119, - 0.064]), and online teaching anxiety. The model accounted for 33.8% (f 2 = 0.401) of online teaching anxiety.

Conclusion: The results of this study indicated that it is important to reduce job demands and increase job resources to alleviate college teachers' online teaching anxiety to maintain good mental health; while maintaining a high level of college teachers' subjective well-being is also helpful for promoting their work performance. Furthermore, the indirect effects of job demands and job resources on online teaching anxiety mediated by college teachers' subjective well-being were also significant.

Keywords: job demands; job resources; online teaching; subjective well-being; teaching anxiety.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Hypothesized model.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Path analysis results.

References

    1. Darius PSH, Gundabattini E, Solomon DG. A survey on the effectiveness of online teaching–learning methods for university and college students. J Inst Eng India Ser B. (2021) 102:1325–34. 10.1007/s40031-021-00581-x - DOI
    1. Vlachopoulos D, Makri A. Quality teaching in online higher education: the perspectives of 250 online tutors on technology and pedagogy. iJET. (2021) 16:40–56. 10.3991/ijet.v16i06.20173 - DOI
    1. Guo F, Hong X, Coates H. Accelerated transformation: designing global online higher education. HERD. (2020) 39:1322–6. 10.1080/07294360.2020.1824209 - DOI
    1. Yan C, Wang L. Experienced EFL teachers switching to online teaching: a case study from China. System. (2022) 105:102717. 10.1016/j.system.2021.102717 - DOI
    1. Afrouz R, Crisp BR. Online education in social work, effectiveness, benefits, and challenges: a scoping review. Aust Soc Work. (2020) 74:55–67. 10.1080/0312407X.2020.1808030 - DOI

Publication types