Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Oct 12:9:1026586.
doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.1026586. eCollection 2022.

Postoperative serum myoglobin as a predictor of early allograft dysfunction after liver transplantation

Affiliations

Postoperative serum myoglobin as a predictor of early allograft dysfunction after liver transplantation

Jin Zhang et al. Front Surg. .

Abstract

Background: Early allograft dysfunction (EAD) is a common postliver transplant complication that has been associated with graft failure and risk for poor prognosis. There are many risk factors for the incidence of EAD after liver transplantation (LT). This study investigated whether elevated postoperative myoglobin (Mb) increases the incidence of EAD in liver transplanted recipients.

Methods: A total of 150 adult recipients who measured Mb within 3 days after liver transplantation between June 2019 and June 2021 were evaluated. Then, all patients were divided into two groups: the EAD group and the non-EAD group. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed, and receiver operating characteristic curves (ROCs) were constructed.

Results: The incidence of EAD was 53 out of 150 patients (35.3%) in our study. Based on the multivariate logistic analysis, the risk of EAD increased with elevated postoperative Mb (OR = 1.001, 95% CI 1.000-1.001, P = 0.002). The Mb AUC was 0.657, and it was 0.695 when combined with PCT. When the subgroup analysis was conducted, the AUC of serum Mb prediction was better in patients whose preoperative model for end-stage liver disease score ≤ 15 or operative time ≥ 10 h (AUC = 0.751, 0.758, respectively, or 0.760, 0.800 when combined with PCT).

Conclusion: Elevated Mb significantly increased the risk of postoperative EAD, suggesting that postoperative Mb may be a novel predictor of EAD after liver transplantation.The study was registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (Registration number: ChiCTR2100044257, URL: http://www.chictr.org.cn).

Keywords: complication; early allograft dysfunction; liver transplantation; myoglobin; predictor.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study flow chart. Three patients with secondary transplantation were excluded. A total of 150 patients were included for analysis. ICU, intensive care unit; LT, liver transplantation; POD, postoperative day; Mb, myoglobin.
Figure 2
Figure 2
ROC curves of Mb, PCT, and Mb + PCT for EAD. The AUC values of Mb, PCT, and Mb + PCT were 0.657, 0.635, and 0.695, respectively. In total, 1327 ng/ml was the best cutoff value of myoglobin for predicting EAD (sensitivity = 47.2%, specificity = 85.6%). AUC, area under the curve.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Distribution characteristics of myoglobin within 3 days between the EAD group and the non-EAD group after LT. The level of Mb decreased gradually after LT. Mb, myoglobin; EAD, early allograft dysfunction; POD, postoperative day; LT, liver transplantation. **P < 0.01 compared with the non-EAD group.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Subgroup analysis for ROC curves. (A) ROC curves of Mb, PCT, and Mb + PCT for EAD in patients whose preoperative MELD ≤ 15; (B) ROC curves of Mb, PCT, and Mb + PCT for EAD in patients whose operative time ≥ 10 h. The predictive value was better in patients whose preoperative MELD ≤ 15 or operative time ≥ 10 h (AUC = 0.751, 0.758, respectively, for Mb).

References

    1. Briceño J, Ciria R. Early graft dysfunction after liver transplantation. Transplant Proc. (2010) 42:631–3. 10.1016/j.transproceed.2010.02.004 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Deschenes M. Early allograft dysfunction: causes, recognition, and management. Liver Transpl. (2013) Suppl 2:S6–8. 10.1002/lt.23746 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Brea-Gómez E, Villar-Quintana R, Plata-lllescas C, Zambudio-Carroll N, Lopez-Garrido MA, Nogueras-Lopez F, et al. Analysis of the predictive ability for graft loss and mortality of two criteria for early allograft dysfunction after liver transplantation. Transplant Proc. (2018) 50:605–9. 10.1016/j.transproceed.2017.11.057 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Zhou J, Chen J, Wei Q, Saeb-Parsy K, Xu X. The role of ischemia/reperfusion injury in early hepatic allograft dysfunction. Liver Transpl. (2020) 26:1034–48. 10.1002/lt.25779 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bastos-Neves D, Salvalaggio P, Almeida M. Risk factors, surgical complications and graft survival in liver transplant recipients with early allograft dysfunction. Hepatob Pancreat Dis Int. (2019) 18:423–9. 10.1002/lt.25779 - DOI - PubMed